CTA + Footer Exploration Exploring different approaches to the closing section of a Grid Intellig...

CTA + Footer Exploration Exploring different approaches to the closing section of a Grid Intellig...CTA + Footer Exploration Exploring different approaches to the closing section of a Grid Intellig...

The network for creativity

Join 1.25M professional creatives like you

Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free

Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started

Back to feedPost

Alberto Horbaci

• Jul 9

CTA + Footer Exploration

Exploring different approaches to the closing section of a Grid Intelligence Platform.

The goal was to create an ending that encourages action while providing a structured, easy-to-navigate footer for enterprise users. Each concept experiments with different ways of balancing conversion, navigation, and brand presence.

Which direction feels the strongest to you?

Figma Framer Product Design

Kristine Vilnite

max

• Jul 21

Giving a fresh feel to my client's website with @Envato at the forefront of my workflow. 👩‍🎨🍋

Combining my client's brand design and creative assets from Envato, I animated the product using Envato's AI toolkit.

AI is still falling short on delivering a stand alone hero-section-ready output, this is where the human creativity comes in.

AI video was good but flat so I layered in depth, image and texture I got from Envato, giving it fresh, creative, brand-aligned look the raw AI output could not deliver.

Is "technically good", "actually good"? I think it's a distinction AI can't tell. What do you think?

See the full workflow and the part AI can't deliver in the video. 🎬

envatochallenge Web Design Framer

MD Rafee Alam

• Jul 22

Agree with the distinction. Technically good usually means the output is coherent and error free, actually good means it fits the brand and makes the client's product feel like theirs. That second part is still very much a taste call, not something a model can judge for itself yet.

Alex Prokhorov

max

• Jul 21

thinking about packaging this in a few different ways

the full bundle would include the framer template, figma file and a prompt for Codex, Claude or Cursor. what would you actually buy?

1. full bundle 2. template only 3. prompt only

Framer Figma Claude

MD Rafee Alam

• Jul 22

I'd go with option 1, the full bundle. The prompt on its own is only useful if you already have the Figma file to reference, and the template alone means rebuilding the interaction logic from scratch. Selling them separately probably just leads to people asking for the pieces you left out.