Working on motion for YONU.

The visual identity is starting to take shape, so I wanted to see how the logo could behave once it moves.

I explored two directions.

Option 1 is sharper and more engineered. Angular fragments build the mark, a controlled energy pulse moves across the frame, and the wordmark reveals with a more technical, performance-led feel.

Option 2 is quieter. Smaller movements, cleaner reveals, fewer elements, and a much more minimal sense of precision.

Same identity, two very different personalities.

I’m leaning toward one already, but curious which direction feels more YONU to you.

Option 1 or Option 2?

Exploring how the YONU mark behaves in motion while the identity is still developing makes sense. Are these intended for a short logo sting or a longer brand sequence?

Same content. Two completely different vibes.

What happens when you keep the course content the same, but change the structure, typography, and color palette?

Two hero sections. One course. Two different visual experiences.

Which one would you choose? 1 or 2?

Option 1 works well , the heirarchy and card layout on the hero is very smart