A RAG answer without a source is hard to use in real work.

For Shamrock Marketing, I built a workflow for technical standards, product specs and repair guides. It splits documents into passages tagged by product and procedure, retrieves relevant context with Azure AI Search, and generates answers with document and page citations.

A reviewer can open the exact source before acting on an answer. That is the difference between a plausible response and a usable workflow.

Project: https://contra.com/p/WqR6YO2e-shamrock-marketing-or-citation-backed-technical-rag

If your team answers repeat questions from dense PDFs, does more time go into finding the right document or checking the answer?