Just deployed another AI receptionist — handles the full intake cycle with zero humans in the loop.
Answers calls in under 800ms, qualifies the caller, books appointments, sends payment links via SMS, and transfers to staff with a whisper briefing. Works in English, Spanish, or French. Deploys in 5 days.
Built for law firms, dental, real estate, home services, medical, and contractors — any business that loses revenue when calls go unanswered.
Stack: Vapi.ai · ElevenLabs · GoHighLevel · N8N · Twilio · Claude API
AUTONIX is a modern AI automation SaaS website concept designed to help businesses streamline workflows, automate repetitive tasks, and manage AI agents more efficiently.
The design combines a clean, minimal interface with bold typography, futuristic visuals, interactive UI elements, and a seamless user experience. From AI-powered task automation to real-time productivity insights, every section is designed to communicate the value of intelligent automation in a clear and engaging way.
This project explores how thoughtful UI/UX design can make complex AI technology feel intuitive, accessible, and easy to use for modern businesses.
Same support inbox, one difference. Left keeps a human on every send. Right lets the AI send on its own once the draft confidence passes 90, refunds and cancellations excluded.
I built both in Relay this week and I still cannot decide.
Would you flip that switch for your own customers, and at what number?
I'd flip it per topic, not per score. A 90 on a question the AI has answered hundreds of times is safe. A 90 on a question it has never seen is still a guess. Can Relay set a different threshold per topic?
Congrats on getting it approved. Drafting instead of auto-sending is the right default. One edge case worth a guard: calls where the transcript comes back empty or cut short, otherwise the model writes a confident follow-up from almost nothing.