AI limit 1987: AI can't win at chess—planning is uniquely human 1997: AI can't win at Go

AI limit 1987: AI can't win at chess—planning is uniquely human 1997: AI can't win at Go—intuitio...AI limit 1987: AI can't win at chess—planning is uniquely human 1997: AI can't win at Go—intuitio...

The network for creativity

Join 1.25M professional creatives like you

Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free

Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started

Back to feedPost

Al Kaizar Sappayani

• Jan 28

AI limit

1987: AI can't win at chess—planning is uniquely human

1997: AI can't win at Go—intuition is uniquely human

2016: AI can't win at poker—bluffing is uniquely human

2019: AI can't create art—creativity is uniquely human

2023: AI can't get IMO gold—reasoning is uniquely human

2026: AI can't make wise decisions—judgment is uniquely human

Petra Smolčić

• 2d

Repeat after me: AI is complex mathematics, 👏 it's not an actual 👏 living 👏 genius. 👏 People who made AI might be geniuses, but AI is a ✨ tool you can use. ✨ -drops mic- 🎤

Luqman Bukhari

• Oct 8

Just like AI, soon we will be made to believe it's not AI anymore, it's SI. Something more advanced.

But the same way AI lacks a soul, so will SI.

Mastering the tool is good. Selling it as a replacement for humans is just hype.

Be at the top of your game. Build connections, do your own research and planning, and keep finding ways to improve.

It's not that AI is bad. I always wanted something to handle the boring tasks, so I could do the work I love. Not something that takes over the work I love, and botches that too.

P.S. This is a 4-second shot I made in 2023 for Paramount Students. I just added the labels AI and SI on top, and see how perfectly it fits, picturing another ERA OF HYPE SELLING!