Exploring Digital Errors: The Art of Broken SoftwareExploring Digital Errors: The Art of Broken Software
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
We seek perfection, but why forget the errors and mistakes that got us there?
For the challenge, I built 418, I'm a Teapot: a fictional editorial magazine about digital errors, broken protocols, and the small absurdities of failing software [cuz why see boring working software ?]. The name originates from a real HTTP status code that became internet folklore. The tension that exists between technical rigour and the feeling of absurd warmth became the magazine's whole thesis.
The concept: Most software works most of the time. This magazine is about the rest. Every section is an editorial dispatch from a different kind of broken: a curated grid of articles on famous errors; an archive of the past and the present; a gallery of "Artifacts" treating real error states as museum specimens and finally, sealing it off with a slot-machine ad for a completely non existent product.
The workflow: It took me a good 48h which looked like this: 1. Searched for editorial references that the comic-zine could be grounded on, 2. Generate variation to explore various aesthetic differences (Feature: Variations) 3. Building sections, one section at a time. 4. Using the Direct edit function to prompt the change directly (Feature: Direct Edit) 5. Fun native motion and hover states to mimic breaking/ errors of the website 6. Ensuring they stick to the Accessibility guidelines for everyone to enjoy (WCAG 2.1 Level AA Standards) (Feature: Accessibility Audit) 7. Generate prototypes along the way to understand the functionalities (Feature: Instant Prototype) Iteration was the whole game, it took me dozens of passes to get the story right. And stitch worked the best as a collaborator you pushed along with and not just being a hopeful generator of ai slop.
Hmmm, so what did I think of Stitch?  The visual generation was genuinely impressive because every pass was coming out close to what I wanted: how I wanted the editorial layouts to work, the typography, the halftone background, and the article cards. Where it got harder was the interactive behaviors. Prompts took me around 5-6 passes to get the animation right, only for a UI element to change completely.
A few wishlist items for Stitch to become my go-to tool: - When I have multi-step prompts to execute, they often get partially executed. Cleaner instruction handling would help - A "lock element" feature so unrelated edits don't accidentally regenerate things that were already working - Better state preservation across sessions, some refinements would silently revert to its error state - Ability to revert back to its previous state, see the thinking of the model and edit directly to direct the design generation
And finally, 418 - I'm a Teapot is a small joke about a serious idea: that errors aren't failures, they're the moments software is most honest about itself. A editorial magazine about the beauty of broken things, using a tool that's still becoming itself. App link: https://stitch.withgoogle.com/preview/17348996978976062269?node-id=5d820d0846a6468db9618a6f3b319876 Netlify: 82fb0d13-oops-digital-error-zine.netlify.app
Denis's avatar
Speechless for all the right reasons.
Eswarya's avatar
Thanks Denis! That's really nice of you!
Back to feed
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started