The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Taste Test
Round two. Last time you chose between the original screen and my version of it. This time both options are mine.
They answer the same question differently: what if the first departure does not work for you. V1 scrolls sideways, and the cut off card tells you there is more. V2 shows exactly two, the next one and the one after it, and moves the rest behind the chevron next to the route.
This is the last round of "same logic, better surface". After this one I stop polishing and start redesign: the whole flow, the structure, the UX, not just the pixels.
Which version should I carry into it?
1 voted
10%
9 voted
90%
10 votes
Closed
V2 for sure!
Thanks
Thank you!
V2's sideways scroll feels more forgiving for the case where the first option falls through. Have you actually tested which one keeps people from bouncing when that happens, or is this still a gut call?
Thanks! Small correction: V2 has no sideways scroll for options, it just shows two routes (fastest + next), with a chevron next to the destination for the full list.
So V2 surfaces the fastest route quicker and shows two right away, while V1 usually needs a scroll to see route...
V2's chevron-behind-the-fold move quietly changes what "more options" means to the user. Once the full redesign starts, does that route hierarchy carry over, or is it back up for debate too?
Thanks, good catch! One correction: that chevron behavior isn't new, it's from the original app, I kept it as is on purpose.
As for the full redesign, the hierarchy is still open, nothing's decided yet 😊
V2 looks great! ❤️
Thanks!
I think option 2 works better for me. Also, I'd appreciate it if you'd join my A/B test.
Thank you!
v2, the cut off card thing always bugs me
Thank you!
V2 for me. V1 hints there’s more, but the cut-off card almost feels accidental.
Thanks! Fair point on V1, the cut-off was meant to hint at scrolling, but I see how it reads as accidental instead. Good feedback
V2 is the one to carry forward. Showing exactly two routes matches the get me moving now moment better than a row of cut-off cards. Going into the full redesign, I would make the chevron's payoff obvious, since the only user V2 underserves is the one who wants to compare every route at a glance.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Challenges
View all
Related posts
If your dashboard has to be beautiful OR instantly understandable, which one wins?
I designed two visual directions for the same AI Sales Agent dashboard.
Same product. Same data. Same core UX.
Only the visual language changed.
Poll options:
A — Clarity First
B — Energy First
30 voted
53%
27 voted
47%
57 votes
Closed
A clarity outstanding
For this project, the Contra community chose these colors and the concept featured in this post: https://on.contra.com/ppTKmT
Now we’re moving forward. In one of the two animations, we’re thinking of showing the frames more clearly and adding a methane gas effect, but the client disagreed with us, so we decided to let the Contra community decide.
21 voted
78%
6 voted
22%
27 votes
Closed
Option 1 For me
Great design and beautiful presentation.