The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Taste Test
I know we have a war happening right now because of this icon, but what do you prefer?
45 votes
Ends in 8h
I really like the acid brat green one hahaha but i dont think this logo is the best solution >.<
i went with option 2. It gives an aged vibe for the anniversary
the second, no doubt. if you go for the disco vibe, i say vibrancy should be embraced full-out!
I prefer the option 1, it looks amazing!
Nice work. The strongest part is how the idea is framed around a clear design problem rather than just the output.
Opt 2 looks cool
this is really hard =)
but for an app icon, I’m pretty sure it should be the lighter one so it stands out more among all the others
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
Battle of the BASICS! Which basic Design concept do you think looks better??? I'm going to go with the design on the left- what about you guys?
1 vote
Ends in 1d
Hero section design of a Saas product. I started with the energy of the first one in mind initially. But the calm glitter of other version won me over too. Now I genuinely can't decide which one to let go.
10 votes
Ends in 1d
Both are great but Calm all the way
Seeing a lot of people roasting Spotify’s disco-ball logo… and honestly, I get why.
From a pure logo-design perspective, it technically breaks a lot of the things designers are trained to protect: clarity, simplicity, scalability, or even just using the right green, etc.
But I actually don’t think Spotify’s disco-ball logo failed because of the design.
I think it failed because most people saw it with zero context.
Spotify is recognizable enough that they can stretch their identity and do something playful/cultural like this without losing brand recognition.
The problem is that most of us didn’t experience it as part of an anniversary campaign.
We just opened our phones and suddenly Spotify looked different lol.
So instead of feeling intentional, it felt random.
And honestly, that’s such a good reminder that branding isn’t just about the visual itself, it’s about the rollout, the storytelling, and the order people experience things in.
I genuinely think if Spotify had introduced the campaign world FIRST:
the visuals, motion, playlists, nostalgia content, anniversary storytelling, etc.
…and THEN updated the logo…
people probably would’ve reacted more positively.
Because people are usually way more open to change when they understand the reason behind it.
Curious what other designers think though:
Was the issue actually the logo, or just the way it was introduced?
And how far can a brand stretch its identity before recognition starts breaking?
That’s honestly the more interesting branding question to me than whether the disco ball itself is “good” or “bad.”
Yeah I think it really came down to how the logo was introduced, just like you said. Users who weren't aware of Spotify's anniversary were understandably confused - I saw so many comments from people who couldn't even tell it was a disco ball, especially given how small it...
Trending
Claude
Claude has entered the design space. How are you using Claude Design?
Contra University
Learn from expert creatives how to earn more using next-gen AI tools.
creativeaiflow
Creative AI workflows are evolving. What tools do you use, and what are their strengths and weaknesses?
portfolioreview
The best portfolios tell a story, not just show a grid. Share yours for feedback.
freelancerlife
Freelancer life is wins, pivots, and everything in between. What’s yours right now?