WCAG 2.2 AA Accessibility Audit — Tiered Findings ReportBree Sharp
A structured WCAG 2.2 AA audit that produces a findings list you can actually act on — grouped by effort tier, with hour estimates per finding, so you can budget the implementation pass separately or by phase.
Who this is for
Sites with a procurement, RFP, or stakeholder requirement to be WCAG 2.2 AA compliant
Organizations facing a legal / compliance gate (ADA, EAA, Section 508, etc.) that need a vendor-neutral audit before signing implementation contracts
Owners who want to know what's wrong before committing to a remediation scope
What I check
Five evaluation tracks against the WCAG 2.2 spec:
Keyboard navigation — every interactive element traversed with Tab / Shift+Tab / Enter / Space / Arrow keys. WCAG 2.1.1 (Keyboard) and 2.4.7 (Focus Visible).
Screen reader pass — NVDA + VoiceOver on key flows. Landmark structure, heading hierarchy, ARIA roles, announced text. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships), 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value).
Contrast measurement — automated and manual spot-checks on theme and content tokens. Both normal (4.5:1) and large (3:1) text thresholds. WCAG 1.4.3 (Contrast Minimum).
Focus visibility — including WCAG 2.4.11 (Focus Not Obscured, new in 2.2).
Motion / auto-playing content — hero carousels, embedded video, marquee / auto-scroll. WCAG 2.2.2 (Pause, Stop, Hide).
Each finding gets logged with: specific WCAG criterion, affected element location, recommended fix, and an effort estimate in hours.
The deliverable
A structured findings report grouped by remediation effort:
Quick Wins (≤30 min each): contrast tweaks, missing aria-labels, focus-visible CSS fixes
Standard (1-3 hours each): keyboard handler additions, landmark restructuring, alt text passes
Heavy Lift (3+ hours each): carousel motion controls, custom widget ARIA patterns, multi-page semantic restructuring
This lets you greenlight remediation by tier rather than line-item, and gives procurement a defensible budget number.
What's NOT included
Implementation. This is the audit deliverable. If you want me to implement the fixes too, that's a separate scoped engagement based on the audit findings.
Manual user testing with disabled users. Strongly recommended as a follow-on if your compliance gate requires it; I can refer you to specialized providers.
Process
You send me your URL + scope (which pages / templates need audit)
I run the 5-track evaluation across the agreed scope
You get the findings report within 1 week, ready to take to procurement or your dev team
FAQs
Starting at$1,000
Duration1 week
Tags
Procurement
WordPress
Accessibility
A11y
ADA Compliance
Audit
Section 508
WCAG 2.2
Service provided by
Bree Sharp proKentucky, USA
- 3
- Followers
WCAG 2.2 AA Accessibility Audit — Tiered Findings ReportBree Sharp
Starting at$1,000
Duration1 week
Tags
Procurement
WordPress
Accessibility
A11y
ADA Compliance
Audit
Section 508
WCAG 2.2
A structured WCAG 2.2 AA audit that produces a findings list you can actually act on — grouped by effort tier, with hour estimates per finding, so you can budget the implementation pass separately or by phase.
Who this is for
Sites with a procurement, RFP, or stakeholder requirement to be WCAG 2.2 AA compliant
Organizations facing a legal / compliance gate (ADA, EAA, Section 508, etc.) that need a vendor-neutral audit before signing implementation contracts
Owners who want to know what's wrong before committing to a remediation scope
What I check
Five evaluation tracks against the WCAG 2.2 spec:
Keyboard navigation — every interactive element traversed with Tab / Shift+Tab / Enter / Space / Arrow keys. WCAG 2.1.1 (Keyboard) and 2.4.7 (Focus Visible).
Screen reader pass — NVDA + VoiceOver on key flows. Landmark structure, heading hierarchy, ARIA roles, announced text. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships), 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value).
Contrast measurement — automated and manual spot-checks on theme and content tokens. Both normal (4.5:1) and large (3:1) text thresholds. WCAG 1.4.3 (Contrast Minimum).
Focus visibility — including WCAG 2.4.11 (Focus Not Obscured, new in 2.2).
Motion / auto-playing content — hero carousels, embedded video, marquee / auto-scroll. WCAG 2.2.2 (Pause, Stop, Hide).
Each finding gets logged with: specific WCAG criterion, affected element location, recommended fix, and an effort estimate in hours.
The deliverable
A structured findings report grouped by remediation effort:
Quick Wins (≤30 min each): contrast tweaks, missing aria-labels, focus-visible CSS fixes
Standard (1-3 hours each): keyboard handler additions, landmark restructuring, alt text passes
Heavy Lift (3+ hours each): carousel motion controls, custom widget ARIA patterns, multi-page semantic restructuring
This lets you greenlight remediation by tier rather than line-item, and gives procurement a defensible budget number.
What's NOT included
Implementation. This is the audit deliverable. If you want me to implement the fixes too, that's a separate scoped engagement based on the audit findings.
Manual user testing with disabled users. Strongly recommended as a follow-on if your compliance gate requires it; I can refer you to specialized providers.
Process
You send me your URL + scope (which pages / templates need audit)
I run the 5-track evaluation across the agreed scope
You get the findings report within 1 week, ready to take to procurement or your dev team
FAQs
$1,000