Most agency websites fail in the handoff. The brand strategists hand to the designers. The designers hand to the developers. By the time the site ships, the strategy has been laundered through three teams that didn't write it. What launches is competent but inert.
This engagement collapses the handoff. One person owns the strategy, the design, and the build. Same brand logic that informed the wireframes informs the components. No translation loss, no relay.
Eight weeks. Six pages plus CMS. Full design in Figma, full build in Framer. Performance-tuned, SEO-foundational, and yours to manage after handoff.
Why this engagement model exists
I started in brand identity. Then I watched developers build what I'd designed, and the brand logic kept slipping through the cracks of someone else's interpretation. So I learned Framer. Now I design and build in lockstep, which means the way the brand thinks shows up in how the site behaves, not just how it looks.
The Contra profile says "verified Framer Partner." That credential is mechanical. The actual differentiator is that I'm a brand strategist and a Framer Partner, which means the build decisions are brand decisions, not just technical ones.
Who this is for
Series A onward B2B and SaaS companies replacing a starter site with the company they're becoming. Founders preparing for a launch, fundraise, or upmarket move where the site is doing real strategic work. Teams who want to ship a real website (not a template) in one sprint, with one accountable lead, and not relay it through three vendors.
Not for: companies that need a 30-page content-heavy site with complex commerce (the Webflow Website Design + Development engagement at $10K is built for that), or teams who only need a one-page landing page (use the Framer Landing Page Design + Development engagement at $5K).
What you walk away with
A strategic intake: audience, positioning, conversion goals, competitive read, information architecture workshop.
A six-page hi-fi design in Figma: home, product or solution, pricing, about, plus two supporting pages of your choice. Each one designed to do a specific job in the funnel, not just exist.
A reusable design system: components, type, color, motion language, all built to extend.
A pixel-tight Framer build, responsive across desktop, tablet, mobile.
CMS setup for the dynamic content you need: blog, case studies, customer logos, careers.
Performance optimization: real lazy loading, asset compression, font tuning. Sub-2-second LCP target on desktop.
SEO foundation: meta tags, OG images, semantic structure, sitemap, robots.txt.
If your engagement starts with a Credibility Gap Audit ($1,500), that credits. If it starts with Brand Identity ($7,500), that credits too. The Framer site is the high-impact surface in the BRIGHT Method (Baseline → Rooted → Identity → Guidelines → High-Impact Surfaces + Transfer), so the path from any earlier engagement to this one is built-in.
Recent reference
Bolt.new and Augment both shipped through versions of this engagement model. Different category, different stage, same logic: brand-strategy-anchored Framer builds that don't lose anything in translation.
Most agency websites fail in the handoff. The brand strategists hand to the designers. The designers hand to the developers. By the time the site ships, the strategy has been laundered through three teams that didn't write it. What launches is competent but inert.
This engagement collapses the handoff. One person owns the strategy, the design, and the build. Same brand logic that informed the wireframes informs the components. No translation loss, no relay.
Eight weeks. Six pages plus CMS. Full design in Figma, full build in Framer. Performance-tuned, SEO-foundational, and yours to manage after handoff.
Why this engagement model exists
I started in brand identity. Then I watched developers build what I'd designed, and the brand logic kept slipping through the cracks of someone else's interpretation. So I learned Framer. Now I design and build in lockstep, which means the way the brand thinks shows up in how the site behaves, not just how it looks.
The Contra profile says "verified Framer Partner." That credential is mechanical. The actual differentiator is that I'm a brand strategist and a Framer Partner, which means the build decisions are brand decisions, not just technical ones.
Who this is for
Series A onward B2B and SaaS companies replacing a starter site with the company they're becoming. Founders preparing for a launch, fundraise, or upmarket move where the site is doing real strategic work. Teams who want to ship a real website (not a template) in one sprint, with one accountable lead, and not relay it through three vendors.
Not for: companies that need a 30-page content-heavy site with complex commerce (the Webflow Website Design + Development engagement at $10K is built for that), or teams who only need a one-page landing page (use the Framer Landing Page Design + Development engagement at $5K).
What you walk away with
A strategic intake: audience, positioning, conversion goals, competitive read, information architecture workshop.
A six-page hi-fi design in Figma: home, product or solution, pricing, about, plus two supporting pages of your choice. Each one designed to do a specific job in the funnel, not just exist.
A reusable design system: components, type, color, motion language, all built to extend.
A pixel-tight Framer build, responsive across desktop, tablet, mobile.
CMS setup for the dynamic content you need: blog, case studies, customer logos, careers.
Performance optimization: real lazy loading, asset compression, font tuning. Sub-2-second LCP target on desktop.
SEO foundation: meta tags, OG images, semantic structure, sitemap, robots.txt.
If your engagement starts with a Credibility Gap Audit ($1,500), that credits. If it starts with Brand Identity ($7,500), that credits too. The Framer site is the high-impact surface in the BRIGHT Method (Baseline → Rooted → Identity → Guidelines → High-Impact Surfaces + Transfer), so the path from any earlier engagement to this one is built-in.
Recent reference
Bolt.new and Augment both shipped through versions of this engagement model. Different category, different stage, same logic: brand-strategy-anchored Framer builds that don't lose anything in translation.