Paper done on Lenin and his dictatorship

Brooke Toth

Content Writer
Copy Editor
 
The desperation of the People of Russia and how it led to Russian Leader Vladimir Lenin creating a dictatorship.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Brooke Toth
Dictators, typically exploit large scale events that disrupt society to leverage their way into power. The Covid pandemic is one of many events that leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban have used to consolidate power[i]. The Russian Revolution was no different. At the time prior to Vladimir Lenin’s ascent to power, Russia was in an extreme state of poverty. Everyone looked for someone that could help with the horrendous economic situation that Russia was in from prior leaders. Vladimir Lenin used the promise of a communist utopia and the desperation of the people of Russia to leverage his way into a dictatorship.
 
            The people of Russia were desperate and extremely vulnerable after several centuries of failed leadership. A crucial point in the revolution was how horrific living conditions were at the start of the 20th century. Peasants took up an estimate of “82%”[1] of the Russian population. What worsened life for the peasantry is how dated and inefficient farming was. Russia is a large land mass but without proper industry, the mass collections of natural resources could not be extracted. When industrialization was attempted, due to the high percent of peasants and the inefficient farming, people starved. Less people could grow food, food was not being grown with modern tools and to top it all off, none of the attempted industrialization was planned. Members of the “mir” were not motivated to change how farming was done. Peasants were also required to pay significant redemption payments after the abolishment of serfdom in 1861. The people who left to work in industrialized towns were also in a tricky situation. Because of the lack of planning on the Tsar’s part, rooms were crammed to the brim with industry workers. They were famished due to less peasants working in the fields. 12-hour days were common, and it was made clear that industry workers were easily replaceable. People were miserable on both ends of the attempt to modernize Russia. Education was a privilege many could not afford. This is key to understanding why ideas spread so vapidly. As of 1881, an estimate of only 10 percent of the population could read or write and only 2 percent had some sort of education. Simple ideas could be spread like wildfire through the dense mod of peasants, whereas detailed ideas quickly stifled. Censorship was difficult for the Tsar since most ideas spread work to mouth. Thanks to the densely packed housing and the lack of respect towards the workers, revolts began popping up. The intense hunger and poor living conditions finally made people realize that they couldn’t live under the Tsar much longer. After several revolts, the Tsar released the October Manifesto, which promised a people’s parliament called the Duma which was a type of government that the Tsar was able to veto any unliked ideas thus muting its power. This calmed revolts until 1917, when the Tsar was forced to abdicate due to poor decisions during World War One. World War One was the tipping point for the Russian economy with high fatality rates and less farmers, once again leaving the people of Russia hungry, mad, poor, and relatively vulnerable to anyone with a solution.
           
            After the departure of the Tsar, a temporary government called the “Provisional Government” was put into power. This government was mainly former Duma members and therefor had many vulnerabilities, ultimately resulting on the takeover of the  “Bolsheviks”; communist party. The Bolsheviks used the starvation and frustration of the working class to their advantage. Their leader, Vladimir Lenin was able to gain support for his party due to his ability “to change his ideas and the situation in Russia into Communist like ideas[2]” This helped build trust and empathy between the Bolsheviks and the people of Russia while additionally proving how inoperative the Provisional Government was. Vladimir Lenin was a charismatic individual with exciting new ideas. One article suggests that he was the type of person that was “inspirational and could help others find their voices[3]”. Instead of being an ignorant leader that would not listen to ideas like the Tsar had been, he encouraged others to stand up for themselves. Of course, this was prior to the Bolsheviks winning the civil war, but that is what made others want to stand with him. Later, during War Communism, he did end up banning revolts, so this was all just a ploy, but people did not know it at the time. They had this person, after centuries of being silenced by the Tsar, that listened and encouraged them to take what was theirs and not to take any sort of abuse. People were revolting finally believing that this was good. The communist utopia that Lenin had begun promising finally meant that mothers and fathers wouldn’t have to watch their kids slowly starve. It meant work life would become better and more people would have jobs. The desperation that worsened with the 20th Century and Vladimir Lenin’s charm finally rubbed off on people. Unfortunately, Lenin’s charm did not cover up his brutality which is shown in The Red Terror during the Russian Civil War prior to the Bolsheviks taking over the government. While Lenin did encourage revolutions, he only wanted them if they would aid the Bolsheviks. Victims ranged from people with opposing views or political enemies to very poor peasants and those not meeting work quotas, similarly to how Stalin would run things years later. Punishments would include labor camps or execution. An estimate of 100,000[4] people died from the Red Terror which showed how ruthless Lenin was. Vladimir Lenin needed full control and removing enemies was just the way to do it, even if it made people question his methods.
 
There is no doubt that Vladimir Lenin not only had the desperation of the Russian population but also the motivational factors to get into power. But why is he a dictator and not a communist? Communism is the idea that the people share in wealth and power, that it is shared by state, and the state is the people and everything, wealth and resources, are shared amongst those who need it most. An economic policy instituted by Vladimir Lenin named “War Communism” called for all industries with more than 10 workers to be controlled by the government, private trade was banned, and most importantly it became illegal to go on strike. Any who disobeyed these new laws, would be eradicated by the “Cheka.” Cheka were the first variation of secret police that Lenin had established back in December of 1917, after the October Revolution. At first glance, War Communism did follow Karl Marx’s idea of communism. Private trade was banned, and the industries were being taken control of by the government which made it seem like Lenin was starting to follow up with his promise of a communist utopia, though it could have been viewed as the economy taking complete control of the economy. When threatened, Lenin readily abandoned his principals, keeping his power, when a group of sailors began rebelling. In “March of 1921” a group of formerly loyal sailors and civilians in “The naval base of Kronstadt[ii]” quickly became frustrated with material shortages and some of the other things enacted with “War Communism” Those revolting came up with a list of demands for a more “fair” nation. An army was organized by Lev Trotsky by the request of Vladimir Lenin, slowly but brutally eradicated any sort of rebel. Lenin did follow up on the final act of the policy. Every member of the sailor rebellion was quickly killed by the Red Army. When the civil war ended, Lenin revised his plan to the, “The New Economic Policy”. This new policy began to undo aspects of War Communism. This policy allowed for some privatized trade between peasants and industries, and industries with less than 20 people were returned to their original owners. This would encourage peasants to grow more grain and industries to produce more. When this policy was questioned by the Bolsheviks, Lenin stated, “Let the peasants have their little bit of profit as long as we keep power.”[5] This is a clear indication that Vladimir Lenin’s true intentions, were not in fact, communism. The New Economic Policy was used to reaffirm Lenin’s power and to encourage economic growth. Communism follows the base idea that the people have power. Prior to Lenin obtaining the power he had at this time, He had given a rather infamous speech before the “Second All Russian Congress of Soviets of Workers and Soldiers Deputies.” The speech discussed similar ideas to Karl Marx such as removing the “Bourgeois” authority and making the state ran by the “Proletarian.” “Bourgeois” was a term for the middle class that own industries whereas the “Proletarian” was a term for the working class or lowest class. This portion of his speech does follow Karl’s idea of communism however as discussed previously; Lenin took a completely new direction. The proletarian had no power, they were still peasants who had no control over anything like where their food went. Of course, strikes and protests were forbidden because of War Communism. Some of the bourgeois were given their property back so they had some control, not much but some, nonetheless. Vladimir Lenin had used War Communism and the New Economic Policy to establish and reaffirm his control over the Russian people and neither of those ideas closely resembled Marx’s idea of communism.
 
 
            Vladimir Lenin used the promise of a communist utopia and the desperation of the people of Russia to leverage his way into a dictatorship. By the end of his reign in power, Lenin had completely changed his promises to Russia to accommodate his dictatorship. He used the desperation and hunger of the Russian workers and peasants only to quickly turn against them if they remotely joked about him. He was a ruthless adaptable leader who’s only goal was to maintain power. History books appear to avoid how terrible he was due to his successor being much worse.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bibliography
 
 
Chamberlin, William Henry. “Soviet Russia: Chpt. 4.” Soviet Russia | Chpt. 4. Accessed October 12, 2021. https://www.marxists.org/archive/chamberlin-william/1929/soviet-russia/ch04.htm.
Chamberlin, William Henry. “Soviet Russia: Chpt. 4.” Soviet Russia | Chpt. 4. Accessed October 12, 2021. https://www.marxists.org/archive/chamberlin-william/1929/soviet-russia/ch04.htm.
Engels, Karl Marx and Frederick. Manifesto of the communist party. Accessed October 12, 2021. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/.
Lane, David. “V.I. Lenin's Theory of Socialist Revolution - David Lane, 2021.” SAGE Journals. Accessed October 12, 2021. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0896920520958451.
Lane, David. “V.I. Lenin's Theory of Socialist Revolution - David Lane, 2021.” SAGE Journals. Accessed October 12, 2021. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0896920520958451.
Lenin, Vladimir. Second all-russia congress of Soviets of workers' and soldiers' deputies. Accessed October 12, 2021. https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/oct/25-26/index.htm.
“The Red Terror.” Russian Revolution, October 1, 2020. https://alphahistory.com/russianrevolution/red-terror/.
Wright, John, and Steve Waugh. Russia and the Soviet Union, 1917-41. London: Hodder Education, 2016.
 
 
 
 
Partner With Brooke
View Services

More Projects by Brooke