David Mesíček's Work | ContraWork by David Mesíček
David Mesíček

David Mesíček

Data analyst focused on trading and performance reports

New to Contra

David is ready for their next project!

Cover image for BTCUSD / Ichimoku Cloud / 1H–1D Tested the Ichimoku Cloud on...
BTCUSD / Ichimoku Cloud / 1H–1D Tested the Ichimoku Cloud on BTCUSD using BUYONLY, SELLONLY, and BOTH execution modes across 1H and 1D timeframes, benchmarked against buy & hold. Performance was evaluated via return, drawdown, volatility, Sharpe, and Calmar ratios. The main result is a persistent long bias. BUYONLY outperformed across both timeframes (≈67% annualized return, Sharpe >1.5), while SELLONLY consistently lost capital. BOTH modes reduced directional risk but diluted performance. Full analysis: BTC Ichimoku Cloud Performance (https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/btc-ichimoku-cloud-performance-david-mes%C3%AD%C4%8Dek-z1tdf)
10
64
Cover image for BTC EMA 9/26 + ATR Filter | BTCUSD | 1H & 1D Tested EMA 9/26...
BTC EMA 9/26 + ATR Filter | BTCUSD | 1H & 1D Tested EMA 9/26 trend signals on BTCUSD with an ATR-based volatility filter across 1H and 1D timeframes. BUYONLY, SELLONLY, and BOTH execution modes were evaluated against Buy & Hold using return, drawdown, Sharpe, and Calmar metrics. ATR filtering materially improves trend stability and reduces drawdowns without suppressing upside. BUYONLY dominates on both timeframes (1H: 83.6% return, Sharpe 1.72; 1D: 75.1%, Sharpe 1.47). SELLONLY remains structurally inefficient in bullish regimes, while BOTH underperforms due to noise from frequent reversals. Full analysis: BTC EMA 9/26 Performance with ATR Filter (https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/btc-ema-926-performance-atr-filter-david-mes%C3%AD%C4%8Dek-vdb6f)
0
11
Cover image for BTC EMA 9/26 Performance (BTCUSD,
BTC EMA 9/26 Performance (BTCUSD, 1H vs 1D) Tested a dual EMA (9/26) crossover model on BTCUSD across intraday (1H) and daily (1D) timeframes, evaluating BUYONLY, SELLONLY, and BOTH exposure modes versus buy-and-hold. Metrics focused on return, drawdown, volatility, Sharpe, and trade count. Key insight: BUYONLY dominates on both horizons (1H: 83.56% return, Sharpe 1.72; 1D: 75.09%, Sharpe 1.47). SELLONLY consistently destroys capital, while BOTH captures trends but suffers from reversal drawdowns. BTC retains a strong long-side structural bias. Full analysis available here: 👉 https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/btc-ema-926-performance-david-mes%C3%AD%C4%8Dek-ei7yf
14
132
Cover image for Parabolic SAR performance on BTC (1H vs 1D) Short research o...
Parabolic SAR performance on BTC (1H vs 1D) Short research on how Parabolic SAR behaves on BTC across intraday (1H) and daily (1D) timeframes. The analysis compared buy-only, sell-only, and combined exposure modes and focused on drawdowns, trend capture, and whipsaw sensitivity. Key insight: SAR works better as a trend and volatility indicator than as a standalone trading strategy. Context and filtering matter. Full analysis available here: 👉 https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/btc-sar-performance-david-mes%C3%AD%C4%8Dek-zdmzf
18
162