Most companies don't lose because their product is bad. They lose because their presence is weak.
I'm not saying this because of some theory. I'm saying it because I've seen it and fixed it.
Self-taught. No degree. Started from retail. Today I work with international clients because I took design seriously when most people weren't even thinking about it.
CEOs and founders already know this the first impression either closes the deal or kills it.
If your brand still looks generic today, your audience has already moved on.
The question isn't whether design matters. The question is whether yours is working.
DM me "BRAND" — I'll audit your current identity.
Free. No pitch. Just honest feedback.
Writing unique code for animations makes iterating on reactive micro-interactions so much smoother. It completely transforms how a brand narrative feels in the browser.
I’m currently working on a branding project for Massage & Mocktails — a concept built around couples learning massage together in a relaxed, social atmosphere.
These are two early, black & white directions from Stage 2 of my branding process, before moving into color, typography, and the full visual system.
The interesting part?
My client chose Concept 1. I chose Concept 2.
Now I’m curious what other creatives think.
Which direction would you choose — 1 or 2? And why?
Sometimes the most interesting part of branding is seeing how differently a client and a designer respond to the same brief.
Concept 2 for me. That interlocking figure mark reads as two people meeting, which is the actual brief here, so it gives you more to build a system on. Concept 1 is the safer, more literal pick, which is usually why clients reach for it.
The way the editorial grid lets Teri’s work lead while the oversized name anchors the page feels beautifully restrained. Nice balance of art direction and a usable Webflow portfolio structure.