The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
An AI agent that can move money is only useful if it can't move it on its own.
Haia lets people manage their banks, crypto wallets and brokerages from one place, just by saying what they want done.
I built the AI orchestration layer. The interesting design choice wasn't the model. It was deciding where the model is not allowed to act.
→ The agent turns a request into a step by step plan
→ Each step is routed to the right banking API, wallet, chain or brokerage
→ Security and compliance checks run before anything executes
→ The user approves every move, and transactions are signed on their own device It's fully non-custodial.
Zero private keys ever exposed, to us or to the model.
If you're building agents that touch money, health records or anything you can't undo, design the approval step first. Then the AI.
The hardest decision on Haia wasn’t which model to use. It was what happens when a plan breaks halfway. Our rule is that the agent stops and asks, and never fixes things on its own. Happy to share how we built the approval flow if you’re working on something similar.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
Happy to share a little piece of what I've been working on lately: Nexus.
Nexus is a concept for a network that moves money and data as fast as the internet moves information. Payments, tokenized assets, AI agents that pay for things on their own, apps that need privacy by default.
The full website is coming soon.
Big idea and it looks great. Excited to see where you take Nexus next.
Business banking is already complex. The product shouldn’t make it feel even harder.
That was the thinking behind Bankora.
Payments, invoices, cash flow, financial overview. These are things business teams deal with constantly, yet many banking products still bury simple actions under dense data, long paths, and complicated navigation.
So I started with the workflows, not the screens.
I looked at the tasks people need to complete most often, where unnecessary steps appear, and what information actually needs attention first.
From there, I built the experience around clearer priorities: key actions available quickly, predictable navigation, structured financial data, and modular UI that makes things like pending and overdue invoices easier to understand at a glance.
I also designed an interactive cash flow calculator to help users see where the business may be heading, not just what has already happened.
The goal wasn’t to make financial operations simpler than they really are.
It was to make interacting with them feel simpler.
Less searching. Less cognitive load. More confidence in what to do next.
And it was especially nice to see Bankora later featured by Contra.
Lovely!
Two concepts. Two different first impressions.
Exploring two visual directions for a finance and AI platform.
Option A | Fundely
Warm gradients, soft curves, and a clean layout. Designed to make finance feel simple, approachable, and easy to trust.
Option B | Proxyma
Bold typography, a structured grid, and a striking 3D visual. Designed to make AI feel confident, modern, and forward-thinking.
Both share the same goal: create a strong first impression through design.
But which direction communicates better?
A or B? I'd love to hear your perspective.
5 voted
50%
5 voted
50%
10 votes
Closed
Adorable
Thumbs up