Your AI agent just did 9 things: pulled 412 orders, matched them to Stripe, caught a duplicate £2...Your AI agent just did 9 things: pulled 412 orders, matched them to Stripe, caught a duplicate £2...
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Your AI agent just did 9 things: pulled 412 orders, matched them to Stripe, caught a duplicate £248 charge, drafted a ledger entry, opened a ticket. Whole run cost $0.011.
Now the real design question — what does the user actually SEE?
A — The transcript. A paragraph of text and a collapsed "Used 3 tools".
B — The run canvas. Nine colour-coded rows: what ran, what it cost, what got flagged, and one step that stops and waits for you before money moves.
Same agent. Same run. Two completely different products.
Vote A or B — and tell me why. I build the B version for a living.

0 voted

1%

A — Transcript

0 voted

1%

B — Run canvas

0 votes

Closed

Usman's avatar
WorkWox logo
One thing I'll defend about B: the amber row. The agent drafted the ledger entry and then stopped — it did not post it. Nine steps ran, one deliberately didn't. You can only design that stop if the UI has somewhere to put it; a transcript has nowhere to show a pause. Curious...
Jaden's avatar
B, and the amber row is the reason. I built a replay viewer for agent runs - timeline, every command with its output, cost per step - and the thing I got wrong first was making the rows tool calls. Nine tool calls is a transcript with colour on it.
What a reviewer actually wants...
Back to feed
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started