Friction vs. Flow: A Quick UX Audit of Banking Apps 💳 Primary user actions in fintech apps usual...Friction vs. Flow: A Quick UX Audit of Banking Apps 💳 Primary user actions in fintech apps usual...
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Muhammad Omer's avatar
Muhammad Omer Usman
• 4h
Friction vs. Flow: A Quick UX Audit of Banking Apps 💳
Primary user actions in fintech apps usually come down to three core tasks: checking balances/card details, viewing transaction history, and sending money. When these actions require multi-step navigation, user experience drops significantly.
The Issue (Mashreq App):
Hidden Navigation: Core functionality like accessing debit card details is buried under secondary menus.
Excessive Friction: Locating basic card info requires triggering two separate page redirects, adding 2–3 minutes of unnecessary searching.
The Benchmark (NayaPay):
Seamless accessibility to core user flows directly from the main dashboard.
Minimal click depth for essential tasks.
UX Takeaway: Primary utility functions should never be hidden behind marketing offers or secondary cards. Prioritizing information architecture based on core user intent reduces friction and improves retention.
How do you balance feature promotion vs. core action accessibility in your app designs? Let’s discuss!👇
#InformationArchitecture #UserExperience
uiuxfintechuxdesignfintechUX DesignUI DesignUX WritingFigma
Post image
Back to feed
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started