A Critical Review of an AI Landing Page and StarlitA Critical Review of an AI Landing Page and Starlit
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Odugbemi's avatar
Odugbemi Opeyemi
• 15h
I critiqued an AI-generated landing page (Lovable) for a review-request tool, then held my own page, Starlit, to the same standard. The critique covers policy-conflicting copy, unsourced proof, navigation and mobile gaps, and what the AI did well. My own page gets the same treatment, including the accessibility score I still need to improve.
Responsive DesignUI DesignWeb DesignClaudeLovable
Post image
Post image
Post image
Post image
Ilian's avatar
Ilian Raykov
• 6h
Holding your own page to the same standard as the AI one is the honest part, most people only do the first half. Which issue showed up in both?
Odugbemi's avatar
Odugbemi Opeyemi
• 5h
Thanks Ilian! The issue that showed up in both was unsourced proof. Kindly had “3x more reviews” and “62% reply” with no source, and my first draft of Starlit had its own “3x” line, which was the same mistake. I replaced it with product facts. My early hero copy also described...
Back to feed
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started