The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Your feature sounds impressive... So what?
I think this is one of the most useful questions in copywriting.
It's easy to describe what a product does. The real challenge is explaining why it matters to the person reading your copy.
Let's say you're writing for a SaaS platform:
Feature: “Our platform offers automated reporting.”
So what?
"It reduces the time spent compiling data manually."
So what?
"Your team spends less time building reports and more time making decisions."
Now we're getting somewhere.
This is the “So what?” test: a simple copywriting exercise that helps you move from product features to meaningful customer benefits.
But a feature isn't useless copy. Features can be important, especially in SaaS, where buyers need to understand what a product actually does. But without explaining the value behind them, your messaging may leave readers doing the work of connecting the dots.
Good copywriting makes that connection clear.
Don't just tell people what your product can do. Show them why it matters.
Next time you write a feature statement, ask yourself: “So what?” Would your answer make your audience care?
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
A headline can attract clicks and still disappoint the reader. And that’s where the line between SEO and clickbait starts to matter.
I think writing a compelling SEO title is one of those things that looks simple until you actually have to do it well.
Your title needs to grab attention, include relevant keywords, match the reader’s search intent, and accurately represent what the article delivers. That’s a lot to accomplish in just a few words.
Clickbait often takes the opposite approach: it creates curiosity through exaggerated claims, misleading promises, or information gaps the content doesn't genuinely fulfill.
And here's my take: getting the click isn't the same as earning the reader's trust.
A good SEO headline doesn't need to be boring or overly literal. You can use curiosity, specificity, and compelling language without misleading your audience.
For example, “5 SEO Mistakes That Could Be Hurting Your Website” is engaging because it tells readers what they'll learn. But “This One SEO Secret Will Make You Rank #1 Overnight” promises something the article probably can't deliver.
The difference isn't just wording. It's whether the content lives up to the expectation the headline creates.
In SEO content writing, a title should attract the right click, not just more clicks.
Because a headline isn't successful simply because someone clicked on it. It's successful when the reader finds exactly what they came for, or something genuinely useful they didn't expect.
Would you rather click on a headline that sparks curiosity or one that tells you exactly what you're going to learn?
Totally agree, the best headline earns the click and the trust, and I’d pick specificity over vague curiosity every time.
UX Writing vs. Copywriting: What's the Difference?
A landing page and a checkout screen shouldn't communicate in the same way.
And I think that's a great way to understand the difference between UX writing and copywriting.
Both rely on clear, intentional language, but they serve different purposes.
Copywriting is generally focused on attracting attention, communicating value, and persuading people to take action. You'll find it in advertisements, landing pages, product descriptions, and promotional emails.
UX writing, on the other hand, focuses on the words people encounter while interacting with a product or service. Its job is to guide users, explain what happens next, and make digital experiences easier to navigate.
Think about it:
A landing page might use persuasive copy to convince someone to sign up. But once that person reaches the registration or checkout screen, the language needs to be straightforward and helpful.
Buttons, error messages, confirmation messages, instructions, and form labels are all examples of UX writing.
What I'm trying to say is that you can persuade someone to start an interaction, but you shouldn't make them struggle to complete it.
Good UX writing reduces confusion and helps people move forward. Good copywriting communicates why they should want to.
And the two can absolutely overlap. A well-written button, for example, can be both persuasive and useful.
Ultimately, both depend on understanding the audience, choosing the right words, and knowing what the user needs at each stage of their journey.
What do you think matters most in digital communication: convincing people to take the first step or making every step easier afterward?
Making every step easier afterward. Getting people in doesn't help if they bail at checkout.
Copywriting vs. Content Writing: What's the Real Difference?
If both involve writing, what actually makes copywriting different from content writing?
I think this is one of the most common questions in the writing and digital marketing world. And honestly, the distinction is simpler than you might think.
Both involve communicating ideas through words, but they often serve different purposes.
Content writing is generally focused on informing, educating, or engaging an audience. Think blog posts, articles, guides, and educational resources. Its goal is to provide value, answer questions, and build an ongoing relationship with readers.
Copywriting, on the other hand, is typically more focused on persuasion and encouraging action. Think landing pages, advertisements, product descriptions, and sales emails. It helps communicate an offer's value and gives the audience a reason to take the next step.
But here's where it gets interesting: they aren't competing approaches. They work better together.
Imagine someone discovers a business through an SEO blog post. The article answers a question, introduces a solution, and builds interest. Later, that person visits the company's landing page, where persuasive copy explains the offer and encourages them to sign up.
One attracts and educates. The other helps convert interest into action.
Of course, content writing can persuade, and copywriting can educate. The distinction isn't absolute; it's about the primary purpose of the message.
My take? Good marketing doesn't need to choose between copywriting and content writing. It needs to understand when each one is most effective.
What do you think: is the difference between copywriting and content writing clear, or do you find the two often overlap?
Great topic - this confuses a lot of people. The way I explain it to my clients: Content writing builds trust (blogs, guides), Copywriting converts that trust into action (ads, landing pages). One ranks, other converts. You need both but at different stages. Curious - do you...