Just launched my first service on Contra. I built an AI system that turns sales calls + CRM data into review-ready proposal decks in minutes.
Trying to position this around speed-to-lead and reducing lost deals and would love feedback:
• Is the value clear?
• Would you click this?
• Anything unclear or missing?
What does practical, agentic AI look like in a real business workflow?
Our new TechFoundry IMS case study walks through seven demos—from purchase-order intake and catalog conflict resolution to vendor orders, shipments, client shipping, and invoice reconciliation.
It shows how AI agents, document processing, and software integrations work together, with human review where judgment matters. I’ve also included the technology stack behind the platform.
Purchase-order intake and catalog conflict resolution feel like the right place to start with agents, since the pain is concrete. How do you handle the cases where the agent is unsure and a human has to step in?
New case study: website for POSSIBLD., an AI-first creative agency.
Bold editorial type, six clear capabilities, a sculptural 3D visual system and a launch film, in EN / DE / UA.
Full case: https://contra.com/p/lverPBgl-possibld-ai-first-creative-agency-website
Live: https://possibld.com
We’re choosing the motion for an AI analytics product demo, and I can’t decide.
Both clips show the same flow. Someone asks a question in plain English. The agent checks permissions, plans the query, runs it past guardrails and builds the dashboard.
1. A walks you through each step as it happens.
2. B skips the steps and drops you straight onto the result.
A shows the work. B shows the speed. For a landing page I keep going back and forth.
Which one would make you trust the product more? Comment A or B, and tell me why.