2-column or 3-column pricing? The debate never ends. šŸ·ļø Here's what the data says: — 3 columns2-column or 3-column pricing? The debate never ends. šŸ·ļø Here's what the data says: — 3 columns
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
2-column or 3-column pricing? The debate never ends. šŸ·ļø Here's what the data says: — 3 columns create a "middle option" anchor effect — 2 columns feel cleaner and faster to decide But which LOOKS better to you? 2ļøāƒ£ = Two plans | 1ļøāƒ£ = Three plans

5 voted

63%

2-column

3 voted

37%

3-column

8 votes

Closed

Boluwatife's avatar
i prefer the 3 column
MD Rafee 's avatar
Going with 2. The cleaner layout forces you to sharpen your value prop rather than hiding behind a middle tier. When someone lands on a pricing page they already know what they need, so the fewer decisions the better.
Sonjoy's avatar
Right
Bhaskar's avatar
3-column for me. The highlighted middle plan immediately draws attention and creates a clearer comparison flow. šŸ‘Œ
Juice's avatar
3 column feels more complete to me.
Pedro's avatar
pro
• 14h
The column count is really a packaging decision wearing a layout costume. Three columns earn their anchor effect only when the middle tier is a real decoy you priced on purpose; bolt on a third plan just to trigger the bias and people sense the padding. So I'd start from...
Back to feed
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started