The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Trending
retrofuturism
Share your favorite designs from the past exploring the distant future. Or your own take on the aesthetic 🚀
halftone
Dots. Texture. Grain. Let's see your designs using the halftone technique.
Midjourney
Creatives are showing off what they're making with Midjourney.
colorgrade
Video editors sound off: How do you enhance the mood of your video in color grading?
Related posts
Let’s Settle the Debate: Gemini vs. ChatGPT
Pulling back the curtain on my design workflow! To show how different AI tools interpret marketing prompts, I put two of the biggest platforms head-to-head.
I used the exact same prompt for both, but the differences in color, depth, and overall composition are massive. Take a close look at the details, textures, and lighting
which tool wins the ultimate ad test?
Cast your vote below
8 voted
25%
24 voted
75%
32 votes
Closed
i'll go for chatgpt
Hey! I just shared a write-up on something I learned while rebuilding a product with AI agents:)
The main idea is pretty simple:
Don’t put all your product context in one giant agent file.
Keep the main file small, and put the real product knowledge inside structured docs that the AI can navigate when it needs them.
This has helped me a lot when working on a SaaS product with a lot of business logic!
Sharing the full breakdown here:
I'm offering consulting services to set this up! :)
The table-of-contents-in-the-main-file pattern is the key move here - it keeps the agent's default context small while still giving it a map to go fetch the architecture or naming-convention doc only when the task actually touches that domain.
I tried Figma make and here's my take on it.
AI can generate something “usable” fast… but it still misses what makes a design feel intentional (hierarchy, restraint, and a clear point of view).
So I redesigned it which focused on:
-> cleaner structure + spacing
-> better visual rhythm
-> more deliberate typography choices
-> a layout that feels designed, not assembled
Check out the live website: www.mathsbylaraib.com
Where do you think AI helps most right now? Ideation, layout exploration, or production?
3 voted
50%
3 voted
50%
6 votes
Closed
Great work, I'd just love to have some animations on the live site. It'll really put more life to it
To ans your question: For me, AI works best for ideation and layout exploration. And I hate to see it has made majority of the community super lazy that they use it for final production. Sucks..