The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Data Mapping & ETL Architecture — a generic reference diagram I use to walk clients through my approach: source system inventory, documented transform logic, a governed warehouse layer, then BI consumption. Used as a starting template on engagements, then adapted to the client's actual systems.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
Discover my exciting🔥new template designed specifically
for venture capital and private equity!
Don't miss out!
Experience it live here: https://tenetcapital.framer.website/
Lovely 😍 great work
Proud to officially add the AWS Certified Machine Learning Engineer - Associate certification to my toolkit!
Building robust machine learning pipelines and scaling AI workloads securely on the cloud has always been a key focus of mine. Earning this certification has been a great deep-dive into mastering AWS ML infrastructure, MLOps best practices, and production-grade architectures.
Ready to bring these advanced capabilities to upcoming data science and engineering projects! Let's build something impactful. 💡💪
🔗 Verify Certificate:
Validation Number: 74c5808986a64b84addcaa9db725b8bd
Verification Link: https://aws.amazon.com/verification
#AWS #MachineLearning #AI #CloudComputing #DataAnalysis #MLOps
Congratulations on earning the AWS Machine Learning Engineer certification, Hazem khaled! Robust pipelines and cloud automation make all the difference for production-grade AI systems.
Building software with AI requires more than a good prompt.
I've been developing my own Autonomous Engineering Harness to structure how I build software with AI.
The idea is simple: instead of relying on AI to generate code one task at a time, I wanted a more structured process that connects specifications, task planning, implementation, code review, and QA.
The harness organizes the workflow into clear stages:
- Specifications: define what needs to be built.
- Task planning: break requirements into manageable units.
- Implementation: coordinate AI-assisted development.
- Review: check the result against the intended requirements.
-QA: validate the software before considering the work complete.
The goal isn't to make AI autonomous for the sake of it. It's to make AI-assisted engineering more structured, repeatable, and easier to validate.
I'm applying this approach to my own projects and continuing to refine the framework as I learn what works in practice.
I wrote more about the approach, the engineering decisions behind it, and how the framework works on my website.
Read the full story: https://yitsymosqueda.com/autonomous-engineering
I'd carry acceptance criteria from the spec into QA as explicit checks, with a result attached to each one. When the spec changes mid-build, does the workflow flag which completed tasks and QA results need to be revisited?