Building a visual studio (video, motion, design, vfx) rooted in hyperrealistic futurism. Our visi...Building a visual studio (video, motion, design, vfx) rooted in hyperrealistic futurism. Our visi...
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Building a visual studio (video, motion, design, vfx) rooted in hyperrealistic futurism.
Our vision is to develop accelerated storytelling formats: AI-generative tools and scripts, detailed post-production techniques, human creativity at the core.
Name’s still TBD. The mark’s closed. Help us pick!
Which one works better?
Ha! Yes I thought about that. I like that it feels like pixels and it's kind of abstract. B feels more "normal" but probably reads better across multiple uses.
Thanks for voting btw! 🚀
Logo Mark A reads cleaner to me at small sizes, which matters a lot for a video/motion studio since it'll mostly show up as a tiny profile icon. Did you test both at favicon size before opening it up to votes?
Yeah, actually that was the main reason behind designing B as an alternative. For socials, locking mark A inside a circle became too small for me actually. I felt that while I like the aesthetics of A a lot, it has too many elements and can become confusing in small sizes. Thanks so much for the detailed comment 🙌
Thanks to everyone who voted! Working on locking the brand system this week + spec video demo projects. Excited to keep sharing good stuff here. Love this community, super grateful for the feedback! 😊 🚀
Exploring two different hero directions for a new project.
Same message, two completely different visual approaches.
Which one makes a stronger first impression?
Both are strong. I lean towards the dark version, because the orange accent on the italic "guess." pops and the profile portrait gives it a more editorial, confident feel. The navy one reads a bit more corporate, which could suit a more conservative audience. Nice exploration!
Keeping the research plan and cited results side by side is a useful way to make the agent’s work easier to inspect. I’d lean toward light mode for reading the table in daylight. How do you distinguish a verified source from one that still needs review?