The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Reducing project rejections by making property submissions easier in the L.A. TDM Calculator
Getting a real estate project approved by the City of Los Angeles involves navigating detailed requirements, and even small mistakes can lead to delays or rejection. The L.A. TDM Calculator was built to help developers meet those requirements, but a key part of the experience wasn’t keeping up with how projects actually work in the real world.
Most projects include multiple properties, each with its own ID number. The tool, however, only allowed users to enter one. This mismatch created confusion, caused errors, and ultimately led to valid projects being rejected.
This project focused on closing that gap, making it easier for users to enter the right information the first time, so they could move forward with confidence.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
What if sending money felt a little more like giving a gift?
For Nova, I explored a banking app that brings payments, cards, and a bit of personality together. You can check your balance, browse recent transactions, send or request money, top up, and pay bills.
My favorite part is the digital postcard feature. Before sending a transfer, you can add a little illustrated card—a heart, a birthday greeting, or a playful character. A simple way to make birthday money or a thank-you feel more personal.
I carried that same 3D character into onboarding, pairing it with bold red gradients and large, clear payment details. There’s room for play, while the recipient and amount stay easy to check.
Would you add a postcard to a transfer? I’d love to know what occasion you’d use it for.
Exploring two different hero directions for a new project.
Same message, two completely different visual approaches.
Which one makes a stronger first impression?
A or B? Curious to hear your thoughts!
36 voted
90%
4 voted
10%
40 votes
Closed
Both are strong. I lean towards the dark version, because the orange accent on the italic "guess." pops and the profile portrait gives it a more editorial, confident feel. The navy one reads a bit more corporate, which could suit a more conservative audience. Nice exploration!
Did a motion for the Cockpit concept ⁕ 🔈 ON
Design & Creative Direction: Me
Motion & Sound: Claude Code
Cockpit is an AI agent management platform concept that helps teams:
- Set boundaries
- Monitor activity
- Manage approvals
- Track knowledge sources
- Measure performance and costs
It brings together five key AI UX challenges:
👉 Autonomy
👉 Observability
👉 Human Approvals
👉 Context
👉 Analytics
The idea is simple:
As AI agents become more capable, the experiences we design around them need to make their actions more transparent, predictable, and manageable.
Thanks!
Human approvals is the part most agent UIs skip. Good call making it one of the five challenges.