The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
AI resume builder with RAG chat — shipped to production, $0 recurring infra.
I design and build lean, production-grade AI products. My latest, kairesume (live at kairesume.fit), tailors resumes to any job description, scores ATS keyword match, drafts cover letters, and answers user questions through a retrieval-augmented chat assistant grounded in real product docs — so it stays accurate.
What I bring to your project:
RAG systems — pgvector, embeddings, chunking, retrieval that doesn't hallucinate
Full-stack AI apps — Next.js 14 + TypeScript, Supabase, Groq/LLM integration, streaming chat
Cost-efficient architecture — I shipped this whole system on a $0 infra budget by making sharp tradeoffs
Production workflow automation — n8n ingestion pipelines
If you need an AI feature built right — RAG chat, document tooling, or an LLM-powered MVP — let's talk. Available for freelance and contract work now.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
Claude just released Fable 5, their most capable model so far.
I tested it on hero section I’m currently working on.
I tried 2 versions:
→ Plain human language prompt
→ Detailed code prompt
There's a clear winner! Overall, I'm impressed.
Have you tried it? What are your thoughts?
Detailed code prompt (I used prompt example from motionsites.ai):
Anthropic just launched it's most capable model: Fable 5
So I decided to test it by building a landing page for AOS: my internal studio OS
Full walkthrough: https://youtu.be/wF4O9LlxnIM
What are you building with it?
Strong walkthrough. I appreciate that you tested Fable 5 in a real builder workflow, with product context, design system constraints, and iterative execution, rather than a generic demo.
We were also testing Fable 5 at RaptorLabs on larger multilayer web application codebases...
Two completely different ways to sell the same skincare line. Which one would stop your scroll?
Scientific Luxury: Clinical, light, proof-heavy. "+47% radiance in 4 weeks," dermatologist stats, review counts, ingredient callouts. This version is selling you confidence in the formula.
Aspirational Beauty: Dark, moody, editorial. A close-up portrait, press mentions, "Beauty That Becomes a Ritual." This version is selling you a feeling.
Same brand, same product, same buttons. Only the emotional entry point changes.
If you were landing on this site for the first time, which one keeps you scrolling? Proof or feeling?
7 voted
33%
14 voted
67%
21 votes
Closed
Going Dark on this one. The editorial approach creates more of a pull because you're buying into a feeling before you even read a word. The clinical version is reassuring but it makes you think, this one makes you want.
Trending
Claude
Claude has entered the design space. How are you using Claude Design?
Contra University
Learn from expert creatives how to earn more using next-gen AI tools.
MagicPath
The canvas is infinite, and exploration is becoming the workflow. How are you using MagicPath?
creativeaiflow
Creative AI workflows are evolving. What tools do you use, and what are their strengths and weaknesses?
freelancerlife
Freelancer life is wins, pivots, and everything in between. What’s yours right now?