Design-to-code handoff becomes fragile when the mapping disappears between the component and the ...Design-to-code handoff becomes fragile when the mapping disappears between the component and the ...
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Daniel's avatar
Daniel
pro
• Jul 29
Design-to-code handoff becomes fragile when the mapping disappears between the component and the browser.
For this concept workflow, I kept the implementation evidence connected from source to output:
— the component anatomy stays tied to semantic HTML — the 24 px spacing token becomes --space-6: 24px — the primary CTA remains a real <a href="#scope"> link — the same structure is checked at 1440, 1024, and 390 px
The signature element is the mapping spine. It links each Figma decision to its DOM, CSS, and responsive proof, making the handoff inspectable instead of presenting a generic “design turns into code” montage.
This is self-initiated concept work using synthetic content, not a client result. It demonstrates the evidence trail I use when translating a supplied Figma landing page into responsive HTML and CSS.
Case study: https://contra.com/p/YA6oNr7l-concept-component-mapping-to-responsive-htmlcss
Web DevelopmentFigmaCSSResponsive Design
Back to feed
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started