The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Most developers make a mistake before writing a single line of code.
They start coding too early.
Yesterday I spent ~4 hours on a potential project and didn’t write any code.
Instead, I:
– broke the idea down into a realistic MVP
– mapped core user flows
– defined the structure (pages, interactions)
– suggested a technical approach
– even generated a quick visual direction using AI
And honestly — that was the most valuable part.
Because code without this is just an expensive way to figure out your product doesn’t work.
My default approach:
System first. Code second.
Curious how others handle this:
Do you invest time in shaping the product early,
or jump straight into implementation?
(quick visual of how I usually think about MVP structure)
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
Title: Your data is not the problem. The structure is.
Most business owners I speak to are not short on data.
They have spreadsheets. Exports. Reports sent every month. Numbers sitting in three different files that nobody looks at after the first week.
The real problem is not missing data — it is data that cannot be read quickly enough to change a decision.
A 5,000 row export tells you nothing at a glance. But a single dashboard showing revenue by channel, top performing SKU, and pending payments — that changes how a founder spends the next hour.
I have seen this pattern across CA firms, D2C brands, and small businesses. The data exists. The structure does not.
Clean structure means:
One place for all numbers
Metrics linked to actual decisions
Flags that tell you when something needs attention — not just what the current state is
If your data lives in scattered sheets and nobody is acting on it, the issue is not the data. It is the system around it.
That is exactly what I fix.
Great definition of your niche!
I almost ruined this one.
Just finished a concept site for a nature photography studio — Aetherial View. First draft had everything I usually reach for. Clever scroll animations. A secondary nav. Hover micro-interactions. A bit of texture behind the hero.
Looked great in Figma. Felt awful next to the actual photographs.
A heron at golden hour doesn't need help from a parallax effect. It just needs to not be interrupted.
So I started removing things. The animations. The second nav. The texture. Half the type styles. Until the site basically got out of the way.
What's left: three nav items. An asymmetric grid that gives each shot room. Serif only where it earns attention — pull quotes, section heads. Black background as a gallery wall.
The hardest part wasn't designing it. It was trusting that less would feel like enough.
For a portfolio site, that's usually the whole brief — even when nobody says it out loud.
This looks clean and well thought out. How long did it take you to bring everything together?
Build a clean, modern, conversion-driven landing page, WriteFlow that clearly explains:
1. What the product does; 2. Why it’s unique; 3.Main value proposition
WriteFlow - it's an AI tool that helps writers simplify their process.
Your thoughts?
Wow. Amazing aesthetic!
Trending
Claude
Claude has entered the design space. How are you using Claude Design?
Contra University
Learn from expert creatives how to earn more using next-gen AI tools.
creativeaiflow
Creative AI workflows are evolving. What tools do you use, and what are their strengths and weaknesses?
portfolioreview
The best portfolios tell a story, not just show a grid. Share yours for feedback.
freelancerlife
Freelancer life is wins, pivots, and everything in between. What’s yours right now?