The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
I generated this logo concept in minutes; here’s how.
One thing about me; I always have visuals in my head.
But since I started in Product Design (not Photoshop/Illustrator), turning those ideas into finished concepts used to slow me down.
That’s why AI Creative Direction has become a huge part of my workflow.
For this logo, I simply:
✨ described the idea I had
✨ shared the brand direction
✨ and Lovart helped me bring the first concept to life
It’s still my vision, just executed faster, cleaner, and with more room to explore.
This is why I love AI:
it doesn’t replace creativity, it amplifies it.
If you want, I can break down exactly how I built this logo next.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Challenges
View all
Related posts
What happens when you take a hero frame from an AI-generated video and push it back into an image edit model?
This weekend I took a still from a recent Seedance 2.5 piece I made —depicting a solo mountaineer in a harsh alpine environment — and ran it through Midjourney's new v8.2 edit model to see how far I could iterate on a single frame without regenerating from scratch.
Tested wardrobe swaps, environment shifts, and style transfers.
Video walkthrough of the process coming in a separate post.
This looks cool
Most pet tech brands are decorating air
Vetti is the opposite: the health layer your dog already needed, finally made readable
Identity and product framing for Vetti 🐾
Big thanks to @Révolté for helping the studio out with this one
Google's AI cited my client's LinkedIn post 11 times last
month.
He wasn't writing for you. He was writing for ChatGPT.
Profile views tripled anyway. Inbound doubled.
If you're a consultant or founder posting three times a
week, getting likes, and still waiting on inbound, this is the ranking game
you're not playing.
AEO. Answer Engine Optimization.
Someone types a question into ChatGPT Search or Google AI
Overviews. The answer comes with sources. LinkedIn posts are on that list.
Semrush ran 325,000 prompts. LinkedIn showed up in 14% of
ChatGPT Search answers.
Most of those citations went to individual profiles, not
company pages. Half came from accounts under 10,000 followers.
Quotability beat follower count.
What gets quoted (steal this):
1. One question per post
→ Line one is the
exact question a buyer would type into ChatGPT.
2. A plain-English definition inside 3 lines
→ AI lifts clean
sentences. It can't quote a vibe.
3. Your own dated numbers
→ "11
citations in August" gets cited. "Great results" doesn't.
4. A headline + About section that claim the topic
→ The model checks
who's talking before it trusts the post.
Check yourself in 5 minutes: type your ideal client's
question into ChatGPT Search and scroll the sources. If a competitor's post is
there and yours isn't, that's your next topic.
The feed forgets your post in 5 days. An AI citation keeps
answering for you for months.
(I'll say the uncomfortable bit: I think AEO beats the feed
algorithm for inbound by 2027. Most coaches selling algorithm hacks won't like
that.)
Two years from now: does a ChatGPT citation beat LinkedIn
reach for inbound, or is AEO just SEO in a new hat? Pick a side.
-- M Aadil A.
