Portfolio update day 8/30 : Three.js website. Today I decided to test the second version of the c...

Portfolio update day 8/30 : Three.js website. Today I decided to test the second version of the c...Portfolio update day 8/30 : Three.js website. Today I decided to test the second version of the c...

The network for creativity

Join 1.25M professional creatives like you

Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free

Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started

Back to feedPost

Taste Test

Create your own

Vasily One

pro

• Jul 30

Portfolio update day 8/30 : Three.js website. Today I decided to test the second version of the corridor: one without detailed surroundings, but with fog and more realistic lighting. I can't decide, so I decided to ask the community. Which version looks more interesting for 3D website?

Claude 3dwebsite Blender

10 voted

77%

3 voted

23%

13 votes

Closed

Afnan Fatima

• 1d

Detailed one

Emmanuel Munteh

• Jul 30

Detailed is more realistic and practical.

kaleemullah kalyar

• Jul 30

I lean slightly toward the left version because it communicates the space more clearly and feels easier to navigate. The right version creates a stronger cinematic mood with the lighting and fog, but I wonder if some environmental details could be reintroduced to maintain the atmosphere while adding more visual storytelling.

DESH Group

pro

• 2d

Detailed works.

stwn andreans

• Jul 27

Which one do you guys think would work as a real-world app with daily use?

Figma Claude uiuxdesign

7 voted

21%

27 voted

79%

34 votes

Closed

Vara Creative

pro

• Jul 27

The redesign looks cool and modern. But for daily use the dark cards feel a bit heavy making them lighter would give you the best of both worlds. Did you test how easy it is to read on the go?

Serge Herasymchuk

max

• Jul 27

The “mobile-first” approach is no longer an option.

A beautiful design for desktop computers does not automatically guarantee an excellent mobile experience. Good responsive design isn’t just about resizing elements to fit the screen; it’s about ensuring they function effectively.

In this comparison, both versions are based on an identical desktop layout. The only difference lies in how the content is adapted for smaller screens.

In one version, everything is simply scaled down.

In the other, the hierarchy, spacing, and composition have been reimagined to meet the needs of mobile users.

Now it’s your turn. 👇

Which mobile version would you choose – 01 or 02? Tell us why in the comments.