The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Document Q&A that cites its evidence - and refuses what the corpus cannot support. Committed evaluation on a labelled set: retrieval recall@3 1.0, refusal accuracy 1.0, grounded rate 1.0. Public code: github.com/jigonyoo/rag-grounded-qa
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Trending
Claude
Claude has entered the design space. How are you using it?
Contra University
Learn from expert creatives how to earn more using next-gen AI tools.
Brand Design
The best brand designers are on Contra. Scroll to see what's trending in brand design. What are you building?
creativeaiflow
Creative AI workflows are evolving. What tools do you use, and what are their strengths and weaknesses?
freelancerlife
Freelancer life is wins, pivots, and everything in between. What’s yours right now?
Related posts
Five tests I run before an inbound voice workflow gets anywhere near a live phone number:
Happy path — can a clear caller complete the one approved use case?
Partial information — does the agent clarify without looping?
Disallowed request — does it refuse and hand off safely?
Interruption, silence, or noise — can the conversation recover?
Provider or transfer failure — is there a deterministic fallback and operator-visible record?
I save the transcript, result, failure notes, latency, and cost for each test. A good demo is not launch evidence; unresolved data, consent, write, and handoff risks stay explicit.
If you want me to configure and test the staging workflow, the fixed-scope sprint is on my profile.
Title: Podium — a season library tool for orchestra librarians
Tagline: The internal tool orchestras don't have: tracking parts, bowings, and distribution for an entire season, in one place.
Description:
Every orchestra has a librarian quietly keeping the whole operation running — tracking which parts are rented vs. owned, whether the bowings are marked before rehearsal, and who currently has which stand's music sitting on their stand. Right now that job runs on spreadsheets, paper checklists, and institutional memory. I wanted to see what a purpose-built tool for that role could look like.
Podium is a 4-screen prototype covering the full workflow: a season library view showing every work in rotation with its parts-prep status at a glance, a score detail view breaking that down section by section, a prep checklist for marking up bowings stand by stand with a live progress counter, and a distribution screen for tracking which musician has which part and when it's due back.
I built it in Flowstep, aiming for something closer to a rare-book catalog than a typical SaaS dashboard — warm paper background, a single brass accent, serif for the repertoire, monospace for every number. It's a niche profession nobody else was likely to design for, which is exactly why I wanted to build it.
Tools used: Flowstep
