The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
LossRun AI — Workers' Compensation Analytics MVP
The decision to surface open claims separately from total claims is exactly right — 23 open out of 142 total tells a risk manager far more than a single number ever could. The AI classification layer on top of the claims breakdown adds real operational value by removing manual...
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
Experimental layouts for Pace. Which one do you like?
23 voted
52%
21 voted
48%
44 votes
Closed
Looks cool.
We kept zooming in on a planet until it didn't fit on the phone.
A ringed gas giant grows until it fills the whole screen and lands on a deep boom. It's drawn in text characters, one per cell, against black space.
It's 11 seconds, and the sound is ours too.
What should we fly past next?
The whole code garden: https://contra.com/p/oRob3r7o
https://givemeprompts.com/lab/
Same headline, same offer, two completely different approaches. Which one would make you stop and tap on an ad for a home hormone test?
Option A puts a real face behind the product.
Option B lets the product do all the talking.
Vote below and tell me why, I’m collecting honest feedback on what feels most trustworthy and clickable.
8 voted
89%
1 voted
11%
9 votes
Closed
Real Face for me. The model holding the box next to the headline feels more trustworthy, and her look leads straight to the question. The product only version reads like a catalog shot.