LIVV has six new people. Sort of. Most of our internal work already runs through agents. One revi...LIVV has six new people. Sort of. Most of our internal work already runs through agents. One revi...
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Most of our internal work already runs through agents.
One reviews design.
One builds.
One listens to what the market is actually saying.
One questions the idea.
One explains it.
One asks whether any of it makes money.
They had no faces, no names, and no reason to exist outside our internal systems.
So we gave them all three.
The Eye decides what’s worth looking at.
The Hand builds.
The Mouth explains it.
The Brain decides whether the idea actually holds up.
Elías listens.
The Pulse asks the uncomfortable question at the end of a nice presentation:
Does any of this actually matter for the business?
This is one of our first experiments with them.
Right now, we're testing how they work as a presentation format — turning the way LIVV thinks, designs and builds into something you can actually watch.
Next, we want to go further.
Instead of making them explain LIVV from a studio, we're going to put them to work.
Meetings.
Bad ideas.
Client feedback.
Design reviews.
Experiments.
Arguments.
Things breaking.
Things working unexpectedly well.
Basically: the everyday life of a slightly strange office.
Except the office is partly run by agents.
And through those stories, we'll show the things LIVV actually does — design, development, automation, AI, growth and whatever we decide to build next.
But we're still figuring this out.
So tell us what feels wrong.
What feels forced.
Who you'd change.
What you'd want to see them do.
And, most importantly:
New case study: the landing page for REVAI, a concept AI sales platform.
The brief I gave myself was structural, not decorative: design a page where every section earns the next one. Hero makes one claim and gets out of the way. The value proposition comes before any feature gets named — because a feature nobody understands yet is just noise. Proof (testimonial, logos) sits right before the final ask, not scattered earlier where it does nothing.
Art direction followed the same logic — high contrast where the page needs to make a claim, quieter and more editorial where it needs to build trust. The layout isn't there to look good in isolation. It's there to move someone from "what is this" to "I trust this" in one scroll.