The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Someone once told me my writing sounded like AI.
It stung. But it was the most useful thing anyone's said about my work.
Because they were right about that piece. It was clean. Correct. And completely forgettable. It could've been written by anyone — or anything.
Here's what I've learned since: sounding human isn't about big words or perfect grammar. It's the opposite. It's the small, specific, slightly imperfect things. The detail only you would remember. The way you'd actually say it out loud. The thought that's a little too honest.
AI can write "5 tips for productivity." It can't write the story about the morning you almost quit.
That's the whole difference. And it's why I don't write posts that sound polished — I write posts that sound like the person behind them.
If your content sounds like everyone else's, it's not a writing problem. It's a you're not in it problem.
#Ghostwriting #ContentWriting #LinkedInContent #Copywriting
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
A thought about copywriting 💭
Copywriting isn’t just about putting beautiful words together.
It’s about understanding people.
Before writing a single sentence, a good copywriter should ask:
Who am I talking to?
What problem are they trying to solve?
What do they care about?
Why should they choose this product or service?
Because people don’t buy simply because something sounds good. They buy when they understand the value and feel that the solution is relevant to them.
That’s why I believe great copy doesn’t just sell.
Great copy connects, communicates, and creates action.
And that is the kind of copywriter I’m working to become. ✍️
#Copywriting #Marketing #ContentWriting #DigitalMarketing #Freelancing #Copywriter
Please share your experience
A strong specialist skill is useless if the wrong system gets invoked. Long-running AI work breaks in boring, expensive ways.
That is not a prompting problem. It is a routing and authority problem.
How I can help you:
I build project routers for teams using multiple AI workflows, agents, or specialist assistants so that they work with each other as a team.
I design source-of-truth resolutions so your agents retrieve the current rules instead of improvising or relying on assumptions or stale chat data.
I create reusable skill registries and specialist handoff logic hardened by determined and dedicated flow states reducing the need for model reliance on its own internal and displaced memory context.
I separate project states with individualized canonical states bound by rules living under essential model instructions and routed properly so unrelated workflows do not contaminate one another, but exist with awareness of the role each project plays, enabling a persistently growing ecosystem to develop organically.
I add governance wrappers, escalation hooks, and recovery mirrors around existing AI stacks so that trust is designed at the root, and variance is eliminated with rule based source archiving and implementation.
Trust means closing your eyes at night and sleeping soundly because your agents got your back. And I can put it all together for you, precision results sourced and undisputed because I got tired of doing things the hard way.
Phillip, agree that routing is where it breaks. In our builds the worst bugs came from an agent pulling an old rule from chat history instead of the current source. Pinning one source of truth per project fixed more than any prompt change did.
BEFORE it shows your post to a single STRANGER.
And most headlines tell it nothing.
The system is called 360Brew.
It doesn't just read your post.
It reads your profile, your last posts,
and the reader's history.
Then it asks one question:
"Who is this person an expert for?"
No clear answer?
No stranger reach.
That matters more than ever.
Per 2026 algorithm studies, only ~31%
of a LinkedIn feed comes from people you follow.
The other ~69% is interest-based.
Strangers. Your future clients.
Two more numbers worth knowing:
→ 8 on-topic posts out of 10 beat 6 out of 10
by roughly 30% in reach.
→ Your profile now counts as proof.
If your headline says "Helping people grow,"
the AI can't place you anywhere.
So posting more won't save you.
→ Rewrite your headline:
"I help [who] get [result]."
→ Make your About and banner say the same thing.
→ Keep 8 of every 10 posts on that one problem.
(Yes, it feels boring.
Boring is how the AI learns you.)
Being known for one thing
beats being liked for ten.
Paste your headline in the comments.
I'll tell you what LinkedIn probably thinks you do.
