Squire - Finance AI - Pricing Here’s the pricing page we designed for Squire, built around a flex...Squire - Finance AI - Pricing Here’s the pricing page we designed for Squire, built around a flex...
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Squire - Finance AI - Pricing
Here’s the pricing page we designed for Squire, built around a flexible usage-based model instead of fixed seats. We kept the plans simple to compare while making the Pro option stand out without adding too much visual noise. Would this pricing model feel clearer for an AI finance product?
We’re choosing the motion for an AI analytics product demo, and I can’t decide.
Both clips show the same flow. Someone asks a question in plain English. The agent checks permissions, plans the query, runs it past guardrails and builds the dashboard.
1. A walks you through each step as it happens.
2. B skips the steps and drops you straight onto the result.
A shows the work. B shows the speed. For a landing page I keep going back and forth.
Which one would make you trust the product more? Comment A or B, and tell me why.