Building a consistent visual language for the brand's digital and retail presence. AI-generated i...Building a consistent visual language for the brand's digital and retail presence. AI-generated i...
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Building a consistent visual language for the brand's digital and retail presence. AI-generated imagery for email campaigns, social media and print materials. To see more, please check my portfolio.
If you ever want to bring these product visuals to life with cinematic, hyperrealistic AI videos, I'd love to help. Feel free to check out my profile for a few samples. I think you'd like what you see.
Writing unique code for animations makes iterating on reactive micro-interactions so much smoother. It completely transforms how a brand narrative feels in the browser.
I’m currently working on a branding project for Massage & Mocktails — a concept built around couples learning massage together in a relaxed, social atmosphere.
These are two early, black & white directions from Stage 2 of my branding process, before moving into color, typography, and the full visual system.
The interesting part?
My client chose Concept 1. I chose Concept 2.
Now I’m curious what other creatives think.
Which direction would you choose — 1 or 2? And why?
Sometimes the most interesting part of branding is seeing how differently a client and a designer respond to the same brief.
Concept 2 for me. That interlocking figure mark reads as two people meeting, which is the actual brief here, so it gives you more to build a system on. Concept 1 is the safer, more literal pick, which is usually why clients reach for it.