App Rejection Errors: Causes, Fixes & Lessons Learned App rejection is a common part of the publi...

App Rejection Errors: Causes, Fixes & Lessons Learned App rejection is a common part of the publi...App Rejection Errors: Causes, Fixes & Lessons Learned App rejection is a common part of the publi...

The network for creativity

Join 1.25M professional creatives like you

Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free

Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started

Back to feedPost

Kayode Clement

• Aug 5

App Rejection Errors: Causes, Fixes & Lessons Learned

App rejection is a common part of the publishing process and often occurs when an app doesn't fully meet store guidelines, privacy requirements, or technical standards. Common reasons include incomplete metadata, missing permissions, unstable functionality, policy violations, or an inconsistent user experience.

The best way to resolve these issues is to carefully review the rejection report, update the app to comply with the platform's guidelines, thoroughly test all features, and resubmit with the necessary improvements.

Lesson Learned: App publishing isn't just about building a great app—it's about delivering a secure, reliable, and compliant experience. Following platform guidelines from the beginning helps reduce delays and leads to faster approvals. #AppPublishing #AppReview #AppRejection #MobileDevelopment #AppStore #GooglePlay #iOSDevelopment #AndroidDevelopment #BugFixing #SoftwareDevelopment #FullStackDeveloper #AIApps #Tech #AppLaunch #Development

AI Application Development Web Design Cursor Expo

Miguel Queirós

max

• Jul 31

Hero section for Semantics AI agents

Web Design Framer Website Development Framer

Juice Lab

pro

• Aug 3

Proof that consistency pays off. Congratulations on the $50k milestone!

Nacho Valenz

pro

• Aug 1

DREAM-O — The global registry of dreams.

I almost never remember my dreams. I wanted an app that would tell me what I dreamed last night — and the moment I imagined it working, I knew what the company behind it would actually be. So I built that company instead.

A pillow unit records every session. Twelve minutes after you wake, the company issues a record. It never explains how.

What you're allowed to see of your own dream depends on which plan you pay for. ORIGIN opens one scene a month. The rest stay in custody — described in full, never opened. Their time, their length, their size, their state. Everything except what happened. After fourteen days they're destroyed. Not for the company. For you. And the company doesn't say destroyed. It says released.

Every screen is written in that voice: procedural, patient, institutional. The product never winks. Nothing on any sheet tells you this is wrong — you work that out yourself, somewhere around the retention page.

One prompt in Flowstep produced six screens. From there it was iteration — prompt, look, correct, look again. Text overflowing, blocks colliding, things that looked fine until I zoomed in. Every screen sits on a percentage grid with four x-values and a single hairline spine at 68.4% height. No border radius, no shadows, no serifs, no accent colour anywhere in the system.

Then I connected Claude Code to Flowstep's MCP server, handed it my design guide, and asked it to audit all fourteen screens against it, one by one. A second prompt to fix what the audit found. It worked inside the Flowstep file over MCP. I went off to cook. I came back and it was ready — I just wired a few links by hand, three clicks each. Fourteen screens for twelve sheets — the record sheet exists three times, one per plan. A path you can walk end to end.

Prototype: https://app.flowstep.ai/file?activeFileId=0a82e6e8-edfa-4dfb-ace8-dfb2e8122859 Social: https://x.com/JosIgnacio17989/status/2083406318304481732 Built with Flowstep · Claude Code over MCP @flowstep_ai #FlowstepChallenge