The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Built a new Webflow site for Tangível, a UX studio in Portugal.
20+ years, 60+ specialists, 380+ projects. Research, design systems, accessibility, product strategy. Finance, energy, telco, government.
The site had to hold all of that without feeling like a brochure. I developed it in Webflow so they can keep publishing cases and services themselves.
Live: tangivel.com
Building it in Webflow so Tangivel can keep publishing cases themselves is the practical call most agency sites skip, they'd rather lock the client into asking for every update. Did handing off that control change how you scoped the actual design work, or was it mostly a backend decision?
It changes the design directly. When the client edits content themselves, every section has to work as a reusable module. A layout that breaks when someone adds a case study or swaps a headline is a failed layout. So the CMS structure, component logic, and visual design happen...
That boundary between fixed and editable is the part people underestimate until a client stretches a module past what it was built for a few months in. Do you carve that boundary out of Relume's components directly, or do you build a stricter custom set once you know it's going to be this CMS-heavy?
I use Relume as a starting point for layout direction and speed. But for CMS-heavy sites like this one, the components get rebuilt in Webflow with stricter rules. Relume gives you 80% of the structure fast. The last 20% - field limits, conditional visibility, content guards -...
nice work..
Thanks! 😃
Good job! 🎉🎉
Thanks! 🚀
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
Built this in Framer as a concept project. Goal was to make it feel run by ex-journalists. Choices: editorial serif (Libre Baskerville), a dark photo with one color accent, and copy that positions against blast-style PR.
Where I’m unsure: text legibility over the photo and whether the two CTAs compete. What would you change?
That's great design it feels professional I like how the background mixed with interface ❤️❤️
Great job Cheree🎉🎉
The only glow on the Kestra page is the reflective strip on the jacket. It comes from the image itself, so the Framer layers on top stay flat: grey, white and mono text, no glow effects on buttons or headings. That keeps the page easy to edit, because nothing in the UI depends on one lighting setup. If you swap the photo, the glow goes with it. Would you add a glow effect in Framer or keep it in the image?
wow, nothing but top notch
I don’t avoid templates just to make things look different.
I avoid flattening a physical brand into a generic digital experience.
A restaurant, studio, fashion label or product can have incredible character in the real world, then lose all of it the moment it becomes a website.
That gap is what interests me.
The website should be able to carry the atmosphere through layout, typography, pacing, motion and interaction, and ideally attract people before they ever experience the physical space.
Not every project needs to be highly expressive.
Some websites should stay simple, direct and functional.
But even simplicity can carry identity.
Bolluni was built with that in mind: translating the character of the restaurant into a digital experience rather than simply presenting information.
Embrace the Creativity.
So well said. That's exactly the problem - a restaurant can have so much soul IRL then become another generic grid online. Love that you don't just avoid templates to be different, but to protect the brand's actual character. 100% agree.