The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
From Cost Center to Growth Engine: The PlatePrestige Story
Luxury brand PlatePrestige was drowning in repetitive queries like "Where is my order?" and "Can I return this?" To scale without hiring more agents, we built a Voiceflow assistant integrated with Shopify, Google Sheets, and Gmail.
What it does:
Instant Returns & Tracking: Checks policies and provides live carrier updates instantly.
AI Personal Shopper: Filters 300+ products into curated recommendations with direct "Add to Cart" options.
Automated Support: Logs complaints to Google Sheets and issues unique IDs for total transparency.
The Results:
✅ 40+ hours saved weekly
✅ ~$4,500/month saved in costs
✅ Instant answers for customers
✅ Team freed to focus on growth
Scaling isn't about more people; it’s about smarter systems that build trust and real business value.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
Most inbound bottlenecks aren't caused by low lead volume—they happen during triage.
When inquiries roll into a Google Sheet or CRM, operations teams often waste 10–15 minutes per submission reading through messy paragraphs, deciphering budget mismatch, and manually deciding who gets an immediate call vs. a standard rate sheet.
Instead of adding a bulky CRM add-on, I documented a lightweight 3-step automation pipeline built inside Make:
Intake & Extraction: An active listener triggers immediately upon a new submission, extracting core variables: client scope, target deliverables, timeline, and stated budget.
Context-Aware Evaluation (Gemini 2.5 Flash): The payload passes through an AI evaluation node with strict guardrails:
Evaluates budget against minimum agency criteria.
Assigns a triage score: Hot (immediate priority), Warm (nurture), or Cold (disqualified/template reply).
Generates a strict 15-word operational summary—no long paragraphs.
Determines an automated next step (e.g., routing to an account lead or flagging for asynchronous follow-up).
Data Return & Clean Pipeline: Appends the structured classification directly back to the master operational tracker, keeping the sheet filterable and clean.
The outcome: The sales and operations team can filter the entire board by priority status in two clicks, cutting first-touch response time to minutes without manually reading every single submission.
I’ve documented the full scenario map, execution logic, and data schemas below.
Curious how other agency operators and automation leads here handle their lead enrichment layer—are you doing AI scoring at the form level, or later in the CRM pipeline?:
For the budget gate, I'd keep an unstated budget separate from one explicitly below your minimum. Does the Make route ask for clarification when the amount or currency is missing, so a potentially suitable lead doesn't fall into Cold by default?
Everyone is shipping AI agents right now. Almost no one is testing them — and that is the whole problem.
A demo agent and a production agent are different animals. The demo works because you walked it down the happy path. Production breaks on the paths you never imagined.
A real example from my own work: a support assistant correctly handed a conversation to a human when someone wrote "I want to talk to a person" in Spanish — but not in English, because one phrase was missing from a rule. Every automated test passed. It only surfaced when I ran real conversations through it.
That is the gap the "agents will replace everything" wave keeps skipping. The hard part was never making an agent act. It is making it:
• say "I don't know" instead of guessing,
• hand control back to a human at the right moment,
• and prove, with tests, that it still behaves when the input gets strange.
Autonomy is cheap. Trustworthy autonomy is the real engineering.
Before you let an AI agent near real users or real data — what is the first thing you check?
The Spanish vs English handoff bug is such a good example. Every test passes until a real user shows up.
This is a customer support chatbot that help users to sell their products online.
User will chat with on your website.
It collect leads on your behalf gather detail in a google sheet.
It will even create meeting add to your Google calendar. It is useful for you as an individual, an entrepreneur, as somebody delivery services or product.
I use my niece boutique as a reference.
Tools:
Ai Agent, Ai chat model, memory, code tools, Google sheet and Google calendar.
Ai Agent: as Ai agent you it a task, it will use several tools at it's disposal to respond and act based on the system prompt.
Ai chat model: respond to all the chats.
Memory: you give your agent memory so that it can remember everything read understand and interpret it.
Code tool: It return the days of the week.It gather information about people that are chatting even see them as potential buyers or not.
Google sheet: It record every sales.
Google calendar: You use Google calendar to book an appointment with your customers
