Same flower house, same layout. We only took the color out.
1. Full color. The iridescent petals do the selling: lilac, pink, a little shimmer. The photo is the brand, and every accent on the page borrows from it.
2. Monochrome. No color at all. Shape, texture and typography have to carry everything, and the page suddenly reads like a gallery catalogue.
Color sells the flower. Monochrome sells the exhibition.
Full color for the storefront. With flowers the color is the product, and the lilac card in the grid shows how much the accents lean on that photo. Monochrome could work as an editorial or gifting page though, where mood matters more than the bouquet itself.
The problem with monochrome is that, throughout computer history, it has conditioned users to associate gray and monochrome with being disabled, dysfunctional, or something to ignore and avoid.
The design is lovely; but I would agree that the full color even with a pop is just so nice. Very visually appealing especially with that sort of lavender / wisteria color. Calming as well.
I think this could be my favorite Framer code component I’ve created. Meet Page Transition Studio, you can add animated transitions between pages across 10 styles. My favorites are vertical strips and centre split. What’s yours? Check the live preview here
Two logo concepts for Formosa1 Exotic Car Rentals. Which one wins?
A: bold geometric F1 monogram, car tucked inside the mark. Strong and iconic.
B: car silhouette leads, red wordmark with a speed streak. Fast and clean.