The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
If your marketing pages only exist after JavaScript runs, you're asking every crawler to do extra work.
How I decide rendering per page:
• Server or static: the content is in the first HTML response
• Crawlers read it right away, and the first paint is faster on mobile
• Client-side: the content appears after JavaScript runs
• Google can render it, but rendering can be queued, and some AI crawlers don't run JavaScript at all
So: pages that must rank (home, services, blog, pricing) are server-rendered or static. Dashboards and anything behind a login can be client-side without losing anything.
Quick test I run on audits: view source (not Inspect) and look for your text. Then use URL Inspection in Search Console to see the HTML Google rendered. Or turn JavaScript off and reload: whatever disappears is at risk.
Have you checked what your raw HTML actually contains?
One real site, one real tip, every day. Follow for more videos.
Follow for more videos: instagram.com/sellwrightstudio · youtube.com/@sellwrightstudio
This is even more important now with AI search. Most AI crawlers don't render JavaScript reliably, so anything that only exists after JS runs — core offer, pricing facts, FAQs — is effectively invisible to them, even if Google eventually renders it. My rule matches yours: if a...
Exactly, Shah Zaib. AI crawlers make the JavaScript-off test matter even more. I also check that the FAQ schema sits in the first HTML response, not injected later by a tag manager, because that is the version most of them actually read.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
A headline can attract clicks and still disappoint the reader. And that’s where the line between SEO and clickbait starts to matter.
I think writing a compelling SEO title is one of those things that looks simple until you actually have to do it well.
Your title needs to grab attention, include relevant keywords, match the reader’s search intent, and accurately represent what the article delivers. That’s a lot to accomplish in just a few words.
Clickbait often takes the opposite approach: it creates curiosity through exaggerated claims, misleading promises, or information gaps the content doesn't genuinely fulfill.
And here's my take: getting the click isn't the same as earning the reader's trust.
A good SEO headline doesn't need to be boring or overly literal. You can use curiosity, specificity, and compelling language without misleading your audience.
For example, “5 SEO Mistakes That Could Be Hurting Your Website” is engaging because it tells readers what they'll learn. But “This One SEO Secret Will Make You Rank #1 Overnight” promises something the article probably can't deliver.
The difference isn't just wording. It's whether the content lives up to the expectation the headline creates.
In SEO content writing, a title should attract the right click, not just more clicks.
Because a headline isn't successful simply because someone clicked on it. It's successful when the reader finds exactly what they came for, or something genuinely useful they didn't expect.
Would you rather click on a headline that sparks curiosity or one that tells you exactly what you're going to learn?
Totally agree, the best headline earns the click and the trust, and I’d pick specificity over vague curiosity every time.
Myth: once the site is live, the project is done.
Fact: launch is the first day the site meets real visitors. It needs care after that: updates, fixes, content and tracking.
What a monthly check covers on the sites I look after:
• Updates on staging first: core, theme, plugins or apps
• Every form tested end to end. Does the email actually arrive?
• Search Console: new errors, new 404s, pages dropped from the index
• Speed on the top pages, on mobile, not just desktop
Most problems I find in audits weren't there at launch. A plugin update broke a form, a page was renamed without a redirect, a new script slowed the homepage.
None of them are dramatic. They just pile up when nobody looks.
Who checks your site after launch, and how often?
One real site, one real tip, every day. Follow for more videos.
Follow for more videos: instagram.com/sellwrightstudio · youtube.com/@sellwrightstudio
Launch day is when the real data starts, and most owners stop looking right then. What's the first thing you check in the first week after a site goes live?
2nd variation of a landing page for a B2B search analytics platform
For this variation, I went with a lighter background where the CTA is visually focused instantly.
You might have 3~5 seconds to get the user's attention, so it's very important how the design looks and feels.
Full landing page coming tomorrow.
