The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
One thing I learned while building a realistic AI trailer:
You can define your character carefully, create multiple reference variations, reinforce facial details in the prompt… and Seedance may still decide she is Anne Hathaway. 😂
My character was visually inspired by Ella Rubin, and in a few generations Seedance kept drifting into something much closer to Anne Hathaway.
To be fair, this may partially be my fault for choosing a reference whose features can already lean in that direction.
What saved me a lot of tokens was using Seedance 2.5’s draft mode before committing to final generations.
I could test:
• whether the framing worked
• whether the movement made sense
• whether the character stayed recognizable
• whether the scene actually matched the cinematic reference
• and, apparently, whether Anne Hathaway was about to make an uninvited cameo
Only after the shot was working would I move to a higher-quality generation.
Character consistency in realistic AI video still takes a surprising amount of preparation. Good references help. Detailed character definitions help. Strong prompts help.
But even with all of that, there’s still a little bit of negotiation with the machine.
And sometimes the machine has casting opinions.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
This photoshoot never happened...
But the campaign could.
No studio.
No location.
No styling team.
No animal handlers.
No huge production budget.
In a traditional workflow, a high-concept beauty editorial like this would be extremely difficult, expensive and in some cases almost impossible to produce. Different models, exotic animals, controlled lighting, makeup, styling, retouching, logistics, safety and a production crew.
With AI, the creative process changes.
Once the visual direction is locked, I can build a consistent system and generate hundreds of images within the same world: different animals, color palettes, compositions, crops, moods and campaign formats.
This is not about replacing every photoshoot. It is about opening creative territories that were previously too expensive, too risky or too complex to explore.
These are just experiments, but I can easily imagine this kind of visual direction working for beauty, eye makeup, color cosmetics, fragrance or high-impact product launches.
For brands that sell through visuals, the real value of AI is not one beautiful image. It is the ability to test bold campaign ideas faster, then scale the strongest direction into a full visual system.
If you’re a Creative in 2026, you should wake up every morning and Say “Thank You Ai “. 😂
Imagine a client wants a premium, animated website, but she only has 2 or 3 images.
A few years ago, you’d probably have to wait for her to organize another photoshoot, get more brand assets, or find a way to work with what you have.
But today? Give me just 2 good images and AI. 😂
I can create different product angles, lifestyle shots, campaign visuals, and all the assets needed to make that website look like the brand spent thousands on photography.
And the best part? The client doesn’t need to spend extra money on another photoshoot.
AI has genuinely changed the way we work
Of course, you still need good design skills and creative direction. AI won’t magically give you good taste.
But the possibilities we have today? Insane.
If you’re still refusing to learn AI as a creative in 2026, you’re making your own work unnecessarily difficult.
Btw this was built with Claude opus 5.5 + Higgsfield AI for the visuals
