I just published a template on framer. This is a redesign of my initial template. I need genuine ...I just published a template on framer. This is a redesign of my initial template. I need genuine ...
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
I just published a template on framer. This is a redesign of my initial template. I need genuine feedback from you guys. I'm here to learn my mistakes. So point out everything you see wrong as a web designer. I'm new to designing so help me out here.
Here's the link:https://www.framer.com/community/marketplace/templates/matchioo-matcha-cafe/
Same flower house, same layout. We only took the color out.
1. Full color. The iridescent petals do the selling: lilac, pink, a little shimmer. The photo is the brand, and every accent on the page borrows from it.
2. Monochrome. No color at all. Shape, texture and typography have to carry everything, and the page suddenly reads like a gallery catalogue.
Color sells the flower. Monochrome sells the exhibition.
The problem with monochrome is that, throughout computer history, it has conditioned users to associate gray and monochrome with being disabled, dysfunctional, or something to ignore and avoid.
In my INKFLESH identity work, the wordmark runs off the can's curve and gets partly hidden behind artwork on posters. That crop asks the rest of the identity to carry more recognition. The mark has a job when the name is only partly there.