Comparing Card and Table Views for Mental Health Patient ListsComparing Card and Table Views for Mental Health Patient Lists
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Same data, two different ways to experience it 🤔
I explored two patient list layouts for a mental health platform: a card view and a table view.
Cards feel more visual and personal, but space is limited and adding more information can quickly make them crowded. For complex enterprise products, I often find tables more practical — they’re easier to scan, compare, sort, and can support more columns when users need greater visibility.
For this kind of workflow, I’m leaning toward the table view. Which would you choose — cards or table?

11 voted

55%

A

9 voted

45%

B

20 votes

Closed

Rahul 's avatar
Pencil & Screen logo
I feel... B is easier to scan
Anna's avatar
Agree 😊 thank you for the feedback!
Wisdom's avatar
Thanks, Anna. You're right that it's ultimately a task call, and framing it that way cuts through most of the card-vs-table noise. Good to see another product designer thinking about scan-speed the same way.
MD Robin 's avatar
Good work
Anna's avatar
Thank you!
NexUX's avatar
amazing work
Anna's avatar
Thank you for the feedback!
Daxesh's avatar
B looks clean and have more details, I'd go with B unless you want to look for person through face
Anna's avatar
Totally agree, for such workflow, a table view is more sufficient. Thank you for the feedback!
Daxesh's avatar
Yess, You're welcome
Tabish's avatar
For clinicians going through lots of patients I'd lean table. Maybe a quick toggle to cards for a more personal view?
Anna's avatar
Hi! Thank you for the feedback! I actually included a standard segmented control to switch between the card and table views, but I really like your idea of having a personal view. Thank you!
Moiz's avatar
B is easer to read as well as it requires less scrolling compared to A.
Anna's avatar
Thank you for the feedback!
Muhammad Hammad's avatar
Anna's avatar
Thanks!
Nazar's avatar
Yasno Design Agency logo
table for me, cards get cramped fast
Anna's avatar
Totally agree! It would also negatively impact usability. Thanks for the feedback!
Nazar's avatar
Yasno Design Agency logo
table for me, staff scan lists all day
Patrick's avatar
Really tidy card layouts
Anna's avatar
Thanks!
Wisdom's avatar
For a mental-health patient list the choice isn't really card vs table — it's scan-speed vs context. The card wins the first meeting because the photo and name set the clinician's mental model before they touch the row, but the table is what holds up under the daily rhythm of...
Anna's avatar
Hi! I really like the hybrid approach you described, it feels very task-oriented. Thanks for sharing this perspective!
Wisdom's avatar
Thanks, Anna — happy it resonated. That task-oriented hybrid really is the sweet spot for clinical workflows.
Emmanuel 's avatar
i will go with Table here
Anna's avatar
Thank you for the feedback!
Wisdom's avatar
Thanks, Anna - and agreed on the hybrid read. The task-oriented framing is what keeps the system honest once real patient volume hits the list. Fun comparison to look at.
Aminul's avatar
I'd go with the table view too. For managing a large number of patients, being able to compare their status, progress, and appointments at a glance is more useful. Cards could work better for a quick patient overview. Maybe offering both views would be the best approach!
Back to feed
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started