The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
A private school website concept, built around one problem: parents comparing schools need real answers fast, not a brochure.
→ Problem: graduation rate, acceptance rate, and test scores were stuck in a downloadable PDF instead of the homepage
→ Solution: pulled those numbers onto the page, gave admissions its own named section
The mound Studio team worked this one. Have an education project? Let's talk — mound.studio
Check out the details Case study here
https://www.behance.net/gallery/254325505/Private-School-Website-Design-Oxford-Heights-UIUX?platform=direct
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
A little throwback to a Webflow project from last year!
The client already had a design they liked, so instead of starting over, we focused on giving it a fresh look and bringing everything to life in Webflow.
Sometimes it's more about improving what's already there than reinventing everything.
Curious how you guys approach projects like this. Do you prefer starting fresh or building on an existing design?
More of my work: https://www.offmade.studio/
Smooth experience!
I missed an important detail in th first design direction, and the client rejected it.
After revisiting the feedback, I came up with another directiona nd it got approved
Both designs serve the same product, which one do you think got accepted for a web application?
Direction 1
Direction 2
9 voted
69%
4 voted
31%
13 votes
Closed
Has to be direction 2
I’ve been building Halevra, a concept brand for a doctor-led longevity and skin clinic in Marylebone. This week was the homepage hero.
Same words, same brand kit, two different layouts.
A puts everything in the centre. The growth rings from the logo run across the whole page, with a few small pieces of the clinic around the headline.
B is quieter. The words sit on the left, one portrait on the right, and a leaf shadow on the wall behind her.
Which one would make you book the consultation?
3 voted
50%
3 voted
50%
6 votes
Closed
I would go with B, the editorial split. For a doctor-led clinic the portrait and the calm space around it do a lot of the trust work, and the headline reads clearly without competing with the rings. In A the rings are lovely but they pull the eye away from the message and the...