Projects using Analytics Canvas in Dublin

Projects using Analytics Canvas in DublinProjects using Analytics Canvas in Dublin

Cover image for “When decisions become real without

“When decisions become real without valid authority” This work examines how AI-driven decisions can appear valid while lacking the authority or conditions required to become actionable. It focuses on a critical gap: – outputs are treated as admissible – decisions are accepted as valid – but authority and conditions are never fully established The analysis highlights: – where systems assume authority rather than explicitly validating it – how admissibility is inferred instead of resolved – where decisions become actionable without sufficient grounding – why systems can execute correctly while lacking valid basis The goal is to identify where decisions are allowed to become real, not because they are admissible, but because nothing prevents them from being treated as such.

3

125

Cover image for Decision Integrity Stress Test
A structured

Decision Integrity Stress Test A structured approach to identifying where AI-driven decisions fail under real-world conditions. This work focuses on testing whether decisions that are: – correct – compliant – and authorized …remain valid at the moment they are executed. The stress test surfaces: – where decisions drift from their original conditions – where systems cannot re-establish grounding – where inadmissible actions are still allowed to execute It is designed to identify failure points that do not appear in audits, logs or standard governance processes. Used before deployment, it helps ensure that AI systems can withstand real conditions - not just pass validation on paper.

2

82

Cover image for This work demonstrates how AI

This work demonstrates how AI outputs can appear valid while still being unsafe to act on under real conditions. It focuses on the gap between: – what a system produces – and what a system is actually allowed to execute The analysis highlights: – how outputs can pass evaluation but fail at execution – why risk emerges at the transition from intent to action – where systems lack constraints at the point of commit The goal is to identify where AI-driven decisions become actionable without being fully validated against current state, authority and conditions.

2

87

Cover image for This work highlights a critical

This work highlights a critical failure mode in AI systems: decisions that are correct, compliant, and authorized - but no longer valid at the moment they are executed. The focus is on how outputs transition into authority through repeated use, and how systems can begin to act on those outputs without re-validating whether they still hold under current conditions. It explores: – how authority forms through interaction, not just formal assignment – why governance often fails before execution, not after – where systems allow inadmissible actions to become real This perspective is used to identify where AI-driven decisions drift from their original conditions - even when everything appears governed.

1

79