The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
I hate the "thinking" phase when chatting with AI LLMs.
- It doesnt support my ADHD
- I always switch to another tab
- That is a horrible UX
Mapped the reasons when a user switches context
- take notes on Notion, Docs [added a Notes feature]
- have to doodle to help in image generation (especially a non-designer user, with no access to canvas tools) [added draw feature]
- to seek distractions [play mini games]
So, I added distractions within the context. Now a user can STAY a bit longer.
Designed in @paper. Vibe coded on @cursor_ai
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
version 2
What if your AI workflow is the reason your brand still looks generic?
Q2 forced me to reset how I build everything creatively and honestly… I simplified it way down.
Right now my process is just two tools, but waaay more intention behind them.
I’m using Claude to actually think with me. I feed it strategy, references, and the full brand world, and it translates that into really detailed prompts. When you pair that with Nano Banana 2, you finally start seeing visuals that actually feel like your brand.
I stopped expecting AI to figure it out and started directing it like a creative partner.
That’s also why I moved away from MidJourney. The second you need anything brand-specific like real text, packaging, or logos, it starts to fall apart. It’s great for vibes, not for building real brand systems.
This workflow forces more clarity upfront, and the output is 10x more intentional.
Curious how everyone else is using AI right now… are you directing it, or letting it lead?
*Concept only. Not an official collaboration.
good talk
I’ve been experimenting with how AI agents can collaborate instead of working in isolation.
For this project, I set up two agents on a shared canvas using @paperdesign:
→ One agent focuses on UI/UX design
→ The other turns that design into a working website
The interesting part isn’t just the output — it’s the interaction.
The design agent creates the system and layout for both desktop and mobile, and the build agent reads directly from the canvas and keeps the live site in sync.
There’s no traditional handoff. Everything evolves together in real time.
This felt less like using tools, and more like watching a system collaborate.
Curious to explore where this goes next.
Trending
Runway
AI video generation is exploding. What are you dreaming up in Runway?
Contra University
Learn from expert creatives how to earn more using next-gen AI tools.
creativeaiflow
Creative AI workflows are evolving. What tools do you use, and what are their strengths and weaknesses?
portfolioreview
The best portfolios tell a story, not just show a grid. Share yours for feedback.
freelancerlife
Freelancer life is wins, pivots, and everything in between. What’s yours right now?