The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Most AI research tools are just a chatbot with a search button. I built something different.
Every time you ask an AI to research something, you're getting one model, one pass, no quality check. It writes confidently, cites poorly, and you have no idea if what it produced is actually accurate. For anyone making real decisions from AI-generated research, that's a silent risk most people ignore.
The problem gets worse at scale the longer and more complex the question, the more a single model hallucinates, misses sources, and loses structure. There's no one checking its work.
So I built ResearchOS a 5-agent pipeline where each agent has one job. A Supervisor breaks down your question. A Researcher runs parallel searches across 22+ sources. An Analyst extracts data and auto-generates charts. A Writer synthesises a cited report. A Critic fact-checks it and sends it back for revision if anything is wrong. The loop runs up to 3 times before the report is approved.
One question in. A full cited report with charts and PDF export in under 10 minutes.
I tested it live by watching the Critic catch a missing citation mid-run and send the Writer back to fix it before approval. That's the part that makes this actually usable for real work.
Built on LangGraph, Groq, Tavily, ChromaDB and runs entirely on free tiers.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
AI just solved brand consistency.
Tools like Frontify and Typeface can now scan every asset your company produces, flag anything off-brand, and auto-correct it before it ships. Logo placement, color, type, tone all enforced at machine speed.
Which means "staying on-brand" is no longer a competitive advantage. It's a $50/month subscription.
The companies getting praised for their rebrands right now — Ticketsolve, Metricool — didn't win because their assets were consistent. They won because they had a position worth being consistent about.
Meanwhile, 73% of designers are deliberately adding imperfection to their work so it doesn't look AI-generated. And 52% of consumers disengage when they suspect content came from a machine.
The pattern is clear: when perfection is automated, distinctiveness becomes the moat.
So here's the gut-check. Open your homepage and your top competitor's homepage side by side. Swap the logos. If both sites still make sense — consistency isn't your problem. Positioning is.
Wrote about this in today's newsletter
Read on Linkedin
Read on X
Read on Substack
This really stands out. The effort and thought behind it are obvious, and it shows in the final result. Keep pushing like this, you're building something remarkable.
I keep seeing AI founders spend months building… then launch, and nobody shows up.
Usually, the product isn’t the problem, people just don’t know it exists.
Start growing your audience before launch.
👉 Liftoff - AI Founder Webflow Landing Page Template
This really stands out. The effort and thought behind it are obvious, and it shows in the final result. Keep pushing like this, you're building something remarkable.
looks stunning👌
Trending
Runway
AI video generation is exploding. What are you dreaming up in Runway?
Contra University
Learn from expert creatives how to earn more using next-gen AI tools.
creativeaiflow
Creative AI workflows are evolving. What tools do you use, and what are their strengths and weaknesses?
portfolioreview
The best portfolios tell a story, not just show a grid. Share yours for feedback.
freelancerlife
Freelancer life is wins, pivots, and everything in between. What’s yours right now?