The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
I'm opening 5 free automation audits for founders and small-business owners this week.
In 30 minutes, we'll look at:
→ How your leads come in
→ How fast they get a reply
→ Where things fall through the cracks
→ What to automate first (and what not to bother with)
No pitch deck. If I can't help, I'll tell you.
Book a slot here: cal.com/jubril-toheeb-rgh9vp/30min
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
How does your studio know which project inquiries still need a reply?
I built a sample tracker that puts new inquiries in one place and flags overdue follow-ups. In this example, Ava’s request is due for a reply, and the studio owner can review a template before sending anything.
I offer a $250 setup using the tools your studio already has. See the setup and try the demo: https://contra.com/s/ONrqkRl2-project-inquiry-tracker-setup-for-creative-studios
letting the owner look over the template before anything goes out is a nice touch. are studios finding you here or do you reach out to them
One manual task is eating your week. You copy the same details between tools, chase the same follow-ups, and fix the same small errors by hand. I built an Automation Sprint around that one task: we pick a single manual process, map it end to end, and build it in n8n with OpenAI where judgment is needed. Every run is logged, every failure goes to a review queue, and nothing sends without an owner. Result: the task runs the same way every time, with a log you can check. No rebuild of your whole stack, no new tool to learn, one process automated and documented in 5 days. No calls needed. We work async, in text. What is the one manual task you would automate first if you could?
Your GoHighLevel automations are running right now.
Do you actually know what's in them?
Agencies build workflows fast. A client asks for a follow-up sequence, you duplicate an old one, tweak it, ship it. Six months later there are 125 workflows in the sub-account, half of them drafts nobody remembers, and two with the exact same name, so nobody's sure which one is live.
That's how leads get the same message twice. Or none at all.
So I built Automation Guardian.
It connects to a HighLevel sub-account, reads every workflow, and gives you:
→ A health score for the whole account
→ Findings ranked by severity, most urgent first
→ A plain-English explanation of each issue, written by AI, plus the business impact and how to fix it
→ A shareable audit report you can hand to a client
On a real test account it audited 125 workflows in under a second.
And the part I care about most: it's read-only. It never edits, publishes or deletes anything in your HighLevel account. Tokens are encrypted. You stay in control and make every change yourself.
I'm also honest about what it can't see. When HighLevel doesn't share the data a check needs, the report says "Not checked" instead of pretending it passed.
It's launching on the HighLevel Marketplace soon, with a free plan.
If you run a GHL agency and want early access, comment "AUDIT" or send me a DM. 👇
#GoHighLevel #HighLevel #MarketingAutomation #AgencyOwners #SaaS #BuildInPublic #AI
Reporting "Not checked" instead of a pass is the detail that would make me trust the score. Two workflows with the same name is exactly how double sends happen in email platforms too. Does it flag workflows that share a trigger, even when the names are different?