My client was selling a ₹490 wellness workshop to 4-5 people a week.
Same audience. Same product. Different page.
Here's what I changed (mostly above the fold), and why each decision was deliberate:
1. Headline rewritten from product name to outcome people actually want
2. Her face above the fold (trust before the pitch)
3. "What you get" moved up so people don't have to scroll to justify the price
4. Mechanism branded (the RRR method) - so it feels proprietary, not generic
I’m currently working on a branding project for Massage & Mocktails — a concept built around couples learning massage together in a relaxed, social atmosphere.
These are two early, black & white directions from Stage 2 of my branding process, before moving into color, typography, and the full visual system.
The interesting part?
My client chose Concept 1. I chose Concept 2.
Now I’m curious what other creatives think.
Which direction would you choose — 1 or 2? And why?
Sometimes the most interesting part of branding is seeing how differently a client and a designer respond to the same brief.
Concept 2 for me. That interlocking figure mark reads as two people meeting, which is the actual brief here, so it gives you more to build a system on. Concept 1 is the safer, more literal pick, which is usually why clients reach for it.
Explored two different visual directions for the same SaaS landing page.
The structure stays consistent, while the imagery, mood and art direction shift the overall brand feel.
Interested to know which direction feels stronger.