C o m p o n e n t D e s i g n ⏎

C o m p o n e n t D e s i g n ⏎C o m p o n e n t D e s i g n ⏎

The network for creativity

Join 1.25M professional creatives like you

Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free

Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started

Back to feedPost

Ragip Diler

pro

• Feb 20

C o m p o n e n t D e s i g n ⏎

design ui uicomponent UI Design UX Design Web Design Figma

Luis Ramirez

• Jul 17

I’m exploring two homepage hero directions for a Scramble Systems concept and testing which layout communicates the message more effectively.

Both directions use the same core idea: helping small teams deliver big wins in tough situations.

Direction 1 feels more structured and modular.

The large brand title creates a strong first impression, while the green content block makes the key message feel direct and contained.

Direction 2 feels more dynamic and action-driven.

The headline becomes the main focus, the green emphasis adds more energy, and the large athlete image makes the concept feel more immediate.

Direction 1: bold, structured, brand-forward Direction 2: dynamic, focused, action-driven

Which direction feels stronger for a consulting/leadership website?

design Web Design Figma

13 voted

30%

30 voted

70%

43 votes

Closed

Deborah Ayodele

• Jul 18

Direction 2

Serge Herasymchuk

max

• Jul 17

In 2026, great design is about more than looking good. The real challenge is creating something that stands out in a world where AI can generate polished layouts in seconds.

Strong UX and structure are the foundation, but the details make the difference: bold typography, unique compositions, subtle accents, and thoughtful visual rhythm.

For these two hero sections, we explored two different directions. Version 1 is clean and typography-driven, while Version 2 adds supporting cards and decorative elements for more depth and personality.

Which one do you prefer: 1 or 2?